Help! Name suggestions needed for Rationality-Inst!
The Singularity Institute wants to spin off a separate rationality-related organization. (If it’s not obvious what this would do, it would e.g. develop things like the rationality katas as material for local meetups, high schools and colleges, bootcamps and seminars, have an annual conference and sessions in different cities and so on and so on.)
We can’t think of a name for this organization.
We can’t think of any names that seem good enough to be audience-tested.
We don’t have any ideas good enough that we’d want to mention them in this post.
Help.
- Suggest alternate names for the “Singularity Institute” by (19 Jun 2012 4:42 UTC; 33 points)
- Preventing discussion from being watered down by an “endless September” user influx. by (2 Sep 2012 3:46 UTC; 19 points)
- 's comment on Curious authors and ’zines? by (5 Feb 2012 22:42 UTC; 11 points)
- 's comment on Suggest alternate names for the “Singularity Institute” by (19 Jun 2012 7:33 UTC; 11 points)
- 's comment on Another Real World Example of Cognitive Bias by (1 Feb 2012 6:24 UTC; 7 points)
- 's comment on Poll—Is endless September a threat to LW and what should be done? by (14 Dec 2012 6:55 UTC; 0 points)
Google has these things to say about naming organizations:
what makes a good organization name, how to name a business: short, sweet, easily pronounced, legal, alliterative if long, not prone to abbreviation, flexible, timeless, fits with other branding, not already in the dictionary with the same definition, contains a sticky consonant, surprising, seldom directly descriptive, melodious, “cool”, distinct, fun to say, trademarkable, not redundant, not criminal or shady-sounding, not lurid, at most two words, not desperate, medieval, Spanish-sounding. visual element, positive connotation, associated with what you actually do, not numbered, not named for a person, not geographic, looks good printed, rememberable, no bad connotations, spellable, description of what you do in tagline rather than name, harder consonants.
OnStartups: How To Pick A Company Name:
Who are the customers?
One obvious question: when is the name most important? When first heard; Introductions.
Some common names take the form of “[identifier] [word for a group]” or similar, eg: [Rationality] [Institute]
Use online thesauruses to find synonyms for good words, make long lists of words to combine. http://thesaurus.com
Google how to come up with good names, skim chapters in marketing textbooks for meta-ideas.
Don’t react fast/naturally (eg: “the name Waterline is a clever meaningful in-group signal and sounds pretty.”), ask yourself how your target will react (eg: “what’s that, whale environmentalists?”).
Who are your targets? Intelligent ambitious young men or their uninterested 45 year old mothers? Academics? From which field? etc.
Common reaction to mention of the group will be to assume their arrogance (suggesting they can teach smartness, that they have smartness), behaving guarded but curious.
Suggestions: Insight House/ Bayesian House
Reaction: “what does bayesian mean?” it’s the math (credibility+++) of how to decide (arrogance-) etc. Bring evidence into discussion if target identifies as being “logical” (young smart men).
I think that consideration may be highly overestimated in the discussion here. Facebook isn’t about faces, Twitter isn’t about songbirds, google has little to do with the number “googol”, The Apple Corporation isn’t selling fruit… etc, etc.
A short pretty name to remember and be able to look up if you need to may be just as good as marketing. Something like “Waterline Institute” needs be clarified one (“they’re talking about raising a metaphorical ’sanity waterline in the human population”), then it’s a memorable enough name and visual alike.
But something like “Bayesian House” can only be clarified by making a long explanation about mathematical formulas… And it’s not immediately memorable afterwards, because frankly it’s just ‘Bayes’ is just a name, called after Thomas Bayes.
But honestly, I’ve never studied marketing or anything like that, so I may just be talking out of my ass here...
Can’t assume google/facebook/twitter were successful because of a master plan that hinged on their name; their success doesn’t strongly imply they were named well. Anecdotally, facebook was originally “The Facebook”, google was originally “Googol”, Twitter was once “twttr”, and Apple was named on a whim when nothing could be decided on.
Bayesian is an alien word, I still remember wondering what it was when I first saw it. Repeating a word/name aloud is the recommended way to remember them on first impression, and memorability matters, but encouraging that kind of memorability is a small factor anyway, just for the record.
Edit: Whether or not my ideas are good, I disagree that the importance of immediate reaction is overrated. It’s hard to say precisely how it has been “rated” in the conversation, but I think it matters a lot in framing the ensuing seconds of conversation.
Another useful question is: which existing organizations do you want to differentiate yourself from?
For instance there are already companies out there monetizing the “train your brain” promise, such as Lumosity (a name which has some accidental Less Wrong annotations), Mind Sparke, etc.
Based on my research, “foundation”, “Institute” and “center” are the most common nouns that are used in the names of nonprofits in approximately that order. “Center” might be inappropriate because the organization in question will probably not be based out of a single building.
In my view, the most important things are that the name should clearly communicate what the organization does, should not sound cultish, and should sound good in the same sentence as “the singularity Institute”. (This may rule out “Institute” as well.)
Here are some names of mine. Many suggest the emphasis of System 2 over System 1. Others suggest improvements to the process of thinking itself, as opposed to being more correct than others about something.
The Better Decisions Foundation
The Deliberative Thought Foundation
The Foundation for Improved Decision-Making
The Foundation for Reflective Thought
The Foundation for Better Reasoning
The Careful Thinking Foundation
The Foundation for Everyday Rationality
And some clever and probably bad names:
The Slow Thinking Foundation
The Primate Debugging Group
Think Carefully
If we take this—”One obvious question: when is the name most important? When first heard; Introductions.”—seriously, then the simpler the better.
Hence, more descriptive names with a higher syllable count, like “deliberative thought foundation” or “foundation for improved decision-making” are inferior to names like “the better decisions foundation”.
Another consideration: don’t pick something obviously pretentious, like “the primate debugging group”, nor something less obviously pretentious, like “the careful thinking foundation”—so what, that implies that I, let’s say I’m an outsider, am not a careful thinker? On the other hand, “the better decisions foundation” isn’t as pretentious. Or if it is, it’s more acceptable because businesses are interested in better decisions (it’s specific enough that the first thought isn’t merely indignation).
Therefore, I upvoted for “The Better Decisions Foundation”
“The Better Decisions Foundation” is my favorite of the names I suggested as well; that was why I put it first. I put the others mostly to give an idea of the possibilities that were out there, especially if someone wanted to do further brainstorming along the lines I did.
I like “Insight”. It alludes to “Incite”, which is an exciting word that is related to the organization (definition- to give rise to, to urge into action, to stir up, etc). And it also can be broken into “in sight”, which can be related to having your goals in sight, striving to reach for an attainable goal, etc.
So it’s one word, with 3 positive connotations (Insight, Incite, and In Sight)
How about:
Sanity Insight
Rationality Insight
Insight
Insight Institute
Edited: Changed all “InSight” suggestions to “Insight”, because I agree with markette’s critique below.
Forget cleverness for its own sake, optimize for the consequences.
someone reads “InSight”, their brain says “oh, I get it, they combined insight and in sight. Their name is a pun.” imagines suited marketing man. Where do you want to go for lunch?
Capturing that first thought and directing it somewhere useful is crucial
I think you’re right.
Good word, bad capital “S”.
I edited my suggestions to fix it.
I like “Insight” too, but probably not “InSight” as part of the name, feels a bit gimmicky, as markette says.
“Insight Institute” has nice alliteration.
”Applied Insight” has good connotations for caring about effectiveness, as opposed to mere philosophizing. It also has the same initials as “Artificial Intelligence” which I’m not sure if it’s a minus or a plus.
Then they could use old “SIAI” headed notepaper to refer to the union of SI and AI!
Can you imagine anyone’s opinion being altered by such a thing? Its value rounds to zero (It’s nonzero, but the smallest credit the human mind could give it is, I suspect, too much).
I get your point—but still: If something’s initials mean something different, this means it effectively can’t be referenced or googled by those initials.
Yeah, this is a minor point if the name is just two words, but still something to consider if someone has name ideas that include “Figuring Better Ideas”, “Cognitive Insight Applications” or for that matter “Neural Augmentation and Methodical Bettering of Life Alliance” . :-)
Inciting Insight Inside is In Sight!
(Sorry, couldn’t help myself...)
“Insight” reminds me first of Consensus Buddhism. I’d think of anyone speaking of insight in general as selling some form of vipassana. See for example the very influential Insight Meditation Society.
Decision Tree
Decision Tree Foundation.
Combines [thing you do] with [nice sounding word], also lends itself to lots of nice logos.
How about ‘The Decision Tree’?
My favorite so far.
While nicely sounding, it probably does not convey the relevant information to an “outsider”. Particularly, this is something a straw Vulcan would do, make a perfectly logical decision based on lousy priors. It emphasizes process over goals, and so is susceptible to lost purposes.
I wonder if this suggestion can be modified to clarify the ultimate goal: to make the best decision possible, including digging up the best possible priors and testing the conclusions along the way. Unfortunately, my metaphor chest came up cringe-worthy: Decision Tree… Garden?, Cultivating Decision Tree?.
Decision Tree: Roots of Knowledge.
Decision Tree: Applied Wisdom.
Decision Tree: Our mascot is a thinly veiled rip-off of an Ent! Sweet!
If I have understood you correctly, you think that rationality do not corresponds well to having a decision trees, but rather to the process of cultivation them?
I guess you could try to integrate that, but then you are running the risk of making it an in-group name, rather than actually convening some sketchy picture of what the institute is about.
I like these almost as much as like “Waterline”.
Less Wrong
The Modern Rationality Institute.
The institute for Bayesian Reasoning
Center for applied rationality.
The Applied Rationality Institute
Upvoted for “Center for Applied Rationality”.
“The Eliezer Yudkowsky Center for Kids Who Can’t Think Good and Wanna Learn to Do Other Stuff Good Too”
“The Eliezer Yudkowsky center for promoting rationality” actually sounds like a nice and honest name to me.
.
Upvoted for “Less Wrong”.
It’s a perfectly good name for a website, and it’s a perfectly good name for an institute.
I like how Center for Applied Rationality sounds, though it might be too long. Or maybe that isn’t a problem and suddenly the amount of times I type the word CAR would increase.
How about Colligate Institute? Though maybe Colligate is too obscure a word (Google Chrome’s spell-checker has it underlined in red).
Looks too much like a typo for “collegiate”, which is a much more common word.
I’d say its pretty obscure.
The Human Rationality Project.
“Fuck, this doesn’t look good for our species...”
Connotations:
-from the Friendly AI Critical Failure Table
More like it dissolves the question of identity in this case, amirite?
Snerk. I hadn’t even thought of that connotation. I can’t decide if I like the name more or less now!
Definitely more for me, and its a good name anyway.
Can someone explain to me what the joke is that got this comment so many upvotes and AI-joke replies?
It wasn’t a joke suggestion—I actually like the name, and was thinking more in terms of drawing lines between this and the Human Genome Project when I originally wrote it. This comment was also highly upvoted before people pointed out the joke, though it may be that people were laughing in secret and there are more “funny upvotes” than “quality upvotes.”
That being said, in the anime Neon Genesis Evangelion, there is something called the Human Instrumentality Project. The FAI Critical Failure Table result linked is a reference to the goal of this project, which is (in)famous amongst fans of the show; I can’t really say more without spoilers. Googling should provide a more complete overview if you don’t get it.
Thanks!
I got a positive reception for “Waterline” in my comment here.
The name should be meaningful or at least not confusing to the general population.
That really sounds like an unnecessary constraint. It’s not as if the only thing people are going to hear about the organisation is the name; presumably they’d also hear something about what it does.
In my view, a name that doesn’t need to come with an explanation is worth more than a name that makes for good in joke.
False dichotomy. “Meaningful names are better than in-joke names” is not the same thing as “the name must necessarily be meaningful”.
Why?
One friend of mine said that it was confusing not just because he didn’t know why it was relevant, but because the word “Waterline” has no strong positive connotations.
If the goal is to promote rationality, it seems counterproductive to have an offputting name...
“Waterline” isn’t off-putting, just opaque. So are things like “Oxfam”.
Waterline makes me think of Landmark, seasteading, and Bond villains trying to drown the planet.
Don’t forget Sea Org!
.
Waterline makes me think of The Watchtower, Wedge Strategy, and Blackwater USA.
I dislike opacity, myself. Also, I find “Oxfam” transparent.
I expect it to be slightly off-putting. I could be wrong.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKk8w7HRyMg
I think it would need to have a byline to at least give outsiders some idea of what it was about. But that is a really good name.
“Practice Sanity”? “Expect the Likely”?
I like the former. Not really the latter.
I like the latter as a tagline for something.
The Waterline Institute for the Study and Practice of Critical Thinking
The Waterline Institute for the Study and Practice of Rationality, or WISPR.
Someone mentioned Bond villains? I can’t tell if it’s too silly/menacing, or if it’s ridiculously awesome.
How about “Groundswell”?
It refers to a kind of wave, as well as a change in people’s views or behaviour (usually viewed positively). “Grounds” also has a relevant meaning as in “grounds to believe”, without being a blatantly distasteful pun.
Yeah, that would be a great name, not /sarcasm
I don’t mean to pick only on this proposed name, but it sounds like most commenters are seeing the naming ideas from the perspective of insiders, or from the perspective irrationally in love with their proposal.
There are probably dozens of names like Groundswell and Waterline that have clever connotations. Given humans’ propensity to over-associate, this is hardly surprising. I do see a distinction, though, between the two: Waterline has a more immediate / clearer physical image, which is definitely a plus.
What do current notable-ish think tanks, seminar runners, and organized social groups call themselves? (Following markette’s notation)
Think tanks:
[name of notable public figure or thinker] [word for group]
Hoover Institution
Cato Institute
[positive word with coded meaning] [word for group, can come first]
Center for American Progress
Heritage Foundation
[acronym] [not even a whole word]
RAND Corp
[word for group] [thing you do]
Council on Foreign Relations
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Seminar runner names:
[modifier, optional] [thing you do] [word for a group]
National Seminars Group
[related word or phrase, spelling optional]
Career Potential
Construx
[broader group description] [word for group]
American Management Association
Organized social stuff:
[descriptive word or phrase]
Toastmasters
[who you are] [word for a group]
Atheist Foundation
[nice-sounding word, relatedness optional] [word for a group, optional]
Mensa
Lions, Kiwanis, Rotary, etc. Club
[in-group signalling word or phrase]
Penny Arcade
-
If we go for a name template that has a lot of overlap between the three groups, I think the clear favorite is the prosaic [thing you do] [word for a group], bonus points if [thing you do] sounds like [who you are]. If direct description of rationality doesn’t test well, a less literal alternative that still has good overlap is [nice-sounding word, relatedness open or coded] [word for a group].
Some top [word for a group] entries: Institute, Association, Foundation, Center, Group, Council.
By the way, hope you are not trying to do branding by discussing it internally only. None of you are typical minds, so you may want to collect top 10 or top 100 best names and run it by your target audience, see what their impression is. Beta-test it, so to speak. (This forum barely counts as alpha-testing.)
Best I’ve come up with so far:
The Institute for Advanced Sanity
too cute IMO
I like this. Or more generally, I like having “Advanced Sanity” in the name.
Of course, I then wondered if anyone else was using the phrase “Advanced Sanity” (and if I’d taken it from somewhere). The first few hits were all Eliezer on LW, and other people only seem to put together those words accidentally.
I like that name in the abstract but worry about associations with mental health.
Even actual mental health gets “who are they to tell us what’s sane and what isn’t” reactions every now and then. An organization that doesn’t start out with a massive positive reputation might fare worse.
“Advanced Sanity” matches a strong comparative qualifier to a basic trait. While “sanity” has problems, as mentioned below, I think the phrase derives much of its power from its underlying pattern, which can be used in other suggestions.
First ones that come to mind with this structure:
Intelligent Winning
Calculated Success
Acting for Success
Intelligent Change
Rational Success
Purposeful Rationality
Purposeful Wisdom
Purposeful Thought
Purposeful Strategy
& whatever institute, foundation, center etc. bits people want to add on.
Super Sapiens! …I mean sapience.
Adroit Acumen
Elevated Erudition
Superb Sagacity
Crack Contemplation
Don’t know if the pun is intended, but I suspect that some people—not familiar with LW - will take it for a sanitation initiative.
I like the bonus for people who know their Princeton. Maybe not as effective with average audiences, though—slightly weird, several syllables.
I think that’s a problem actually. We don’t want to imply affiliation with them when that isn’t the case.
Having “Rationality” in the name would probably be a bad thing. (Straw Vulcan stereotypes and all that.) “Bayesian” is a much better choice IMO.
Why not call it something like BayesWay?
Or how about that old Japanese cliche… “Better than Yesterday”? That would go well with Stabilizer’s “Update Yourself” byline.
On the other hand, “Bayes” could make people say: “It is about some advanced statistics, that’s not for me.”
I guess the goal is to provide rationality to everyone who cares, not to appear like something for-specialists-only.
I’m not sure that “Bayes” or “Bayesian” has a strong public association with anything unless you’re already interested in statistics. I’ve used it in several discussions and every time had to give a quick explanation of what it meant. (Good practice for honing my explanations and reinforcing the concept in my own brain, as well.)
Upvoted for “Better than Yesterday.”
Why not just call it Less Wrong, or some variation on that?
Have we heard a reason not to do so? It would help to piggyback off the SEO already done.
Wrote a list of 100 ideas, here are the highlights:
Insight Out
The Upsight Institute
Wisdom18
Level Up
Thinking Plus
Reason Out
Making Sense
A few more:
Good Reason
Sight and Mind
Tactical Reasoning
Wisdom Plus One
I’m on a phone, apologies for terse commenting.
I quite like Good Reason
“Tactical Reasoning” sounds cool, but also slightly militaristic. Maybe not the best message to send. Maybe a really cool name for a book or group of rationality katas, though.
You could shelve it next to Street-Fighting Mathematics.
Taken but that unknown enough that something with Good Reason in it, but with a little more, ex. “The Good Reason Group” should work.
I upvoted, but I’ll clarify why, as this is a list: the only name I like on this list is Level Up, but I strongly like it.
A worthy clarification! I considered making one comment per idea, but I’m not sure they are all up to that level of scrutiny.
I also REALLY like Level Up. It solidified pretty quickly in my brain. The name expands pretty easily to “Level Up Enterprises” or somesuch, if preferred. And I can easily envision the second prong on the letter “U” being an up-arrow.
I originally liked Insight Out, but when I reflected on it, I think I am being influenced by consistency bias, because I already threw my hat in with the word “Insight” earlier. I still think it’s a really good one, I just like Level Up better!
I don’t like it much—it brings up mental images that you’re going be there with a bunch of people who treat it as a game, rather than a serious endeavor (something that suggests it might be fun is fine, but not something that suggests it is not serious). And maybe that it will be mostly intended for the video game demographic of socially awkward college-aged men.
I love Level Up except for one thing, one kind of big thing. It may not be meaningful to the majority of people not familiar with gaming. That’s the only thing I see as a potential downside, but...
Center for Excellence in Thinking and Deciding
Less Wrong Foundation
Institute for the Advancement of Human Rationality
.
Not really, “foundations” are usually funds that redirect money to other worthy causes, while the organization in question will be generating its own content and services. On the other hand, there is Wikimedia Foundation, which was the example that established the analogy for me.
.
In this case it’s redirecting minds. That’s the ultimate goal isn’t it?
BTW our best current suggestion came from these comments, so keep it up!
PM me if you want my opinion without revealing the name in public.
It would help if we knew more about what the point of the name is. Most importantly what do you want the name to signal about the organization? Hip and edgy or dignified and respectible? Hardcore or something anyone could be apart of? That sort of thing. Also do you want to embrace or shy away from the fact that you are technically in the self help business.
I think that a good name should be somewhat arbitrary; it should not be a description of what organization does. It is easier to google, and also does lead to quick judgement “yeah, I totally can imagine what exactly they do; I don’t need any more information”.
It should be user friendly, not sound like some government institution or something very advanced scientifically or technically. It should not evoke “this is not for me” response.
Easy to remember and pronounce.
No strong associations. Bad associations are obviously bad, but also associations that are good for some people, are probably bad for some other people.
It’s not just self-help, it’s also other-help, like an educational institution.
Not seen anyone suggest this yet, but the simple things are always good:
Rationality Institute
Derive something from Latin? You’ve got callidus for clever, sapio for wise, subtilis for precise, veri for truth...
So maybe the Callida Council, or Veri Institute, or the Verus Foundation.
The Less Wrong Institution, for the refinement of human rationality.
Sapiet House.
Fuck it, go with BayesCamp.
And “ratio”, which also turns up in “likelihood ratio”. If we’re going ugly corporate neologism, we could do Accuratio (ETA: which turns out to be a company in Latvia).
The Bayes Factor?
BayesCamp would be just one thing that the [insert rationality inst name] provides, I think.
Speaking of which, I wonder what possibilities could arise of coordinating BayesCamp Kids with Camp Quest...
These aren’t very good:
Alliance for Accuracy. Be Right Club. Make No Mistake. Better Believe. Untangle. Second Thought. Judgewell. Sanity Plus.
Query Huggers. Oops Masters. Belief Rentiers. Belief Landlords. Level Up Artists.
Utilon. The Weirdtopia Group.
awesome.
It took me a second to get that.
I beg to differ. Think about what someone who doesn’t get the reference will think.
Good point.
Map Masters. Sanity Sharpeners. Reality Reflecters. Truth Trackers. Bayesbound.
The Disciples of Laplace. The Bayesheviks. The Accurati. The Order of the Urn. Sanity Streamlining. Sanetuary. Decision Division. Madness Mitigation. Consequence Captains. Consequence Institute. Outcome Institute. Veracity Institute. Cooler Cognition Council. Campus Crusade for Correct Cognition. Answers In Sequences. Church of Probabilitology. (Obviously some of these are unviable. Just brainstorming.)
Center for Correct Contrarianism. Unbounded Rationality Institute. All Your Bayes Are Belong To Us Foundation, Inc.
If any LW meetup groups become university-affiliated organizations, this is what they should be called.
The “Fight Club” allusion is good, though. Instant recognition if you can manage to activate that node, and it ties in well with the idea of a rationality dojo.
Combining that with other ideas you’d get “Insight Club”.
“Rationality Dojo” hasn’t been suggested.
Only in plural. :)
Jugewell sound a lot like Givewell (obviously) but I like it! Sanity plus sounds a bit like franchise of Humanity Plus but that might be a good thing (?).
“Grey Belt”—combines the “we are all aspiring rationalists” notion (white belt, also activates the dojo node) with a significant color word—grey matter.
“Possible Minds”—because that’s an Eliezer catchphrase, but also a succinct statement of the intent: to explore the space of possible minds, although only in a tiny region to start with. (You may view the link with SI—exploring the same space much farther out—as a bonus or as a problem.)
“Hedgefox”. Not 100% original, but combines a prediction reference (cover of Tetlock’s book), references to thinking styles, and the notion of cognitive diversity.
Upvoted for Grey Belt. The other two are terrible. Grey Belt on the other hand, is a clear image, very short, and has the added advantage of (possibly) being immediately understood by ~1/2 of the general population (at least next to a good logo).
The Center for Better Reasoning
The Center for Better Thinking
You could name it after a statistician. Laplace is taken, but Bayes, Jaynes, Jeffreys, and others are free.
Bell?
Applied Insight Institute (or just Insight Institute).
Sounds like a Landmark Forum-type cult (although this is an intuition I don’t have much insight into).
Rationality Dojos
Is martial arts really a good metaphor for rationality? I think ergonomics, hygiene, or nutrition is a better metaphor, myself. It’s supposed to be applied to all aspects of your life, it’s hard to measure the benefits, and it’s something you do continuously, rather than at specific times. Also, it’s more about avoiding bad habits than anything.
I agree … and think that martial arts are a perfect metaphor for exactly the reasons you just outlined.
Knowledge of a perfect ‘style’ of fighting would be applied to all aspects of life, and would be continuously practiced. By mastery of the true and sublime kung-fu, you would avoid all bad habits and work forever towards becoming stronger. What you take from the dojo protects you every day, making your life better.
And let’s be honest: a building when you learn to kick ass is WAY sexier than a center that teaches ergonomics, hygiene or nutrition. If we’re trying to sell LessWrong, it can’t hurt to make LessWrong sexy.
I’m not saying that ‘Rationality Dojo’ is the best answer.
But I do really like the metaphor.
Dojo describes the nature of the organisation rather than the subject being studied (e.g. there are Go dojos). This being practical exercises towards a common goal, rather than say an ‘academy’ that studies it in the abstract.
Yes, but how many english speakers know that?
Practical Anticipation (Institute/Project/Center/etc.)
I predict this thread will turn into a bike shed brawl.
Totally obvious, but less likely with this preemptive comment.
The gold standard of such institutions is The Royal Philosophical Society.
Perhaps some form of The __ Philosophical Society.
What goes in the blank I am drawing a blank on. The California or Silicon Valley P.S. would be fine. The opposite of Royal is Commoner so the Common P. S. might be OK. Or Common Sense P.S. Or Real or Reality P. S. I would not use Bayes as a bunch of physical scientists whose attention you might want to attract are nigh-dogmatic frequentists right now but could presumably be weaned from their dogma.
Not sure if the’re good ideas, but the following appear to be free.
The Practical Philosophical Society
The Modern Philosophical Society
The Empirical Philosophical Society.
If anyone on LW happens to be surprisingly well connected “The Royal Rationality Society” would be great.
Not saying that a lot of the stuff on Less Wrong is philosophy, but you don’t think it’s a bit risky going for “Philosoph-” something? A potential improvement would be something more along the lines of Neurophilosphy. (?) New branding that is.
Edit: Oops, suppose to say “[...] is not philosophy [...]”
Maybe it would be wise to make sure people do not confuse rationality with Hollywood rationality or rationalism?
Wise Decision Institute.
Thorough Thought.
Thorough Thinking
EDIT: I guess one could add Foundation.
MBlume’s analogy (way back) of how we’re cartographers has struck me as a cool one. Cartographer to me carries the same kind of weight as Alchemist would. Here are some names based on that trope.
Mind Charts
Internal Compass
Mental Cartography
Map is Territory
I hope someone does better than I can at using this theme.
“Mind Charter” comes off as a pun, because ‘charter’ is literally a treaty as well as a description of someone who makes maps. “The Mind Charter” could stand on its own.
I like how SIAI’s name references both the event you’re working toward and method of achieving it. Is there a single word that describes a watershed event that would indicate the rationality institute’s direct success like “Singularity” does an intelligence explosion? That supporters could rally around and label themselves by (singularitarian)? A word for approximating the ideal Bayesian updater, for felling akrasia, for actually changing one’s mind? Can we create or annex one?
Exaltation, Transcendence, Apotheosis, Enlightenment, Upload, Elevation, Laudation, Upgrade, Epiphanic, and Ideate come to mind, but what I’m looking for is something more like “the act (event) of becoming your best self” in a word. Too many of these have strong religious connotations for me.
After some thought, I hereby create Max Agency! Plucky comic superhero mascot of Zenith Agency (Z.A. Huzzah!) …for Consequential Action (Z.A.C.A.) The acronym for which happens to be Max’s battlecry, but only when shouted in triplicate of course!
Now that I have a word, the idea of an agency without agents (only aspiring agents) tickles me tremendously.
Other thoughts: Agency Institute for Rationality Training (A.I.R. Training)
Agency Foundation for Applied Rationality (A.F.A.R.)
More ideas below. Incidentally, I am not really aiming to win the thread here. I just learned the cool technique of writing lists of 100 ideas, the idea being that quantity leads to quality. Apparently it’s most effective to have some people generate ideas, and others critique them. By now I’m firmly in the first camp on this task.
The latest ideas:
Groundswell (as in logical grounds)
Enhance Mental
Inferential Iteration
Phronesis (or Fronesis)
Logical Operators
Mentat Mentors
Sharp Ratio (a pun on this)
Edit: Fixed links.
Tangent on the 100 idea list: I think this may be one of the most useful little tidbits I’ve ever come across. It’s a perfectly natural complement to the -think about it for five minutes- and -hold off on proposing solutions- ideas, spectacular for solo problem solving. It’s so obvious I feel dumb for not having tried it earlier.
Why we’re spending our time speculating on stuff like directed marijuana highs (Not that I don’t like that post. I do.) when we’ve barely even got our basic katas down I’ll never understand. Unless everyone here is secretly halfway to beisutsukai mastery already and I’ve been left out of the loop. Wouldn’t be the first time something like that has happened.
Lucidity
Reflexively Rational
Powergame Reality
Power Level Life
The Center for the Advancement of Human Reason
Calibrating Cognition
Calibrator
PhronEasy, with the tagline “Making practical wisdom simple”. No, wait, that’s terrible.
My brother does some work for a professional naming company. Their prices are high, but they sound very professional (some of the stuff he talks about is a lot like what was mentioned here. If everything else fails, do be aware that such people exist.
Also, how about “Cogito”? Sounds related to thinking, but otherwise vague and non-threatening.
People would hesitate over the pronunciation of the “g” (which is as in “get”, not as in “gem”—the Catholic Church be damned).
Thinkwell
Thinkbetter
and for the sake of completeness:
Thinkbest
Thinkbest is an evil cybernetics corporation from D20 Modern’s Cyberscape sourcebook.
ThinkBayes?
Damn, it’s taken!
www.thinkwell.com—Effective online videos and online courses for high school and college students in math, science, and social science. Achieve success where traditional …
Better Knowing.
Think to win
I was trying to think of a way to put “win” in there. It’s too bad “Winning the Future” is already taken.
Here’s a lightly-edited brainstorm:
Institute for Clearer Thinking
Foundation for Better Thinking
Better Thinking Buereau
Foundation for Critical Thought
Rationality Foundation
Center for Sharper Thought
Center for Reason and its Applications
Center for Applied Reason
Guild of Reason
Center for Reason
Update: The Rationality Institute
or maybe “Update yourself” might be a nice byline for whatever name is chosen.
I really like “Update yourself” as a byline. Especially in the context of pitching this to tech startups/software developer types. (It’s reminiscent of updating your computer). It could combine well with james_edwards’ suggestion above of Level Up into:
Level Up
byline: Update yourself
(Or: Update Your Self ? )
Looks like the current name is “Center for Modern Rationality”. Points to beoShaffer!
I technically didn’t suggest “Center for Modern Rationality”, but I seem to have been the only one to suggest “Modern Rationality” and it is pretty close to “Center for Applied Rationality”. So, I guess it’s possible I inspired it.
(Centre for) Art of Reason
Art of Winning
Act Better
Right on Target (or Target on Right)
Evidence Based
Mindtweak
Mindhack
Effective Agency
Winning Institute
Inspired Thought
Achieve
Decision Training
Better Model
Perfect Thought
Motivated Action
Upvoted for “Target on Right”.
Afterthought
Y’know, we came up with this idea for this institution and all the cool things we could do. We got so wrapped up in it that the name was kind of an afterthought.
ThinkRight
Are we going for something academic-sounding or something self-improvement sounding?
Mostly we’re just trying to brainstorm such that the more names the better, whether those are academic or self-improvement sounding.
Not sure if this discussion is still ongoing, but...
It seems to me that something that means “rationality” should be in there, and probably a word that means “institute”.
Some words are to be avoided, like ‘belief’, which carry weird connotations. Weird-sounding is probably bad (“Mensa” sounds too weird to lots of people). English words are probably best. Being tied to a person’s name is hardly ever a good idea.
The Institute for Intelligence Utilization
Make Humanity Smarter
Sanity Academy
League of Extraordinary Thinkers
The Brain Society
Lightbringers
Order of Daedalus
Knights Prometheus (EDIT: should probably be “Knights Promethean”)
The Bayesian Priory
Sadly, “Icarus Foundation” is taken.
“The Rationalist Society”
(Possibly its a British thing, but society sounds far better/more benevolent than Institute or similar.)
I have the opposite reaction: “society” sounds much more potentially menacing (whereas “Skull and Bones Institute” makes me laugh out loud).
Whatever Works
Dreamshine
Attainment
Veridian
Reasound
Minds’ Arts
Melodine
Sunshine Army
Embrace Sense
I really like “Whatever Works”
Upvoted for “Attainment”. “Reasound” is clever but awkward to say.
The Society for Enhanced Reasoning
The Institute for Enhanced Reasoning
Thoughtfront.
The Thought Academy.
The Thought Institute.
The Outthink Center.
Either Clarity Workshops (we offer them) or Clarity Workshop (we work on clarity instead of cars). Depends on how much you want to focus on running things-you-can-call-workshops (ie seminars, lectures, group training sessions, and so on).
I’m slightly worried about this association: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_(Scientology)
That did not occur to me. Good point.
Shut Up and Multiply (SUM)
Society for Methodical Rationality Training (SMRT) (ok, not really)
Rationality Praxis Institute
Unfortunately that’s not even a very good phrase to begin with, let alone as a name for an organization. People hearing it for the first time without context mostly seem to assume that refers to reproduction, presumably by comparison to the phrase “be fruitful and multiply”, or at least have that come to mind and are confused about what it has to do with rationality.
Yes, I recall being very confused when I first saw that phrase in Three Worlds Collide. To this day I don’t know why people use “multiply” instead of “calculate”.
Shut Up and Calculate’s Katas would SUCK.
I have always assumed it derived from modeling expected-value calculations as the product of likelihood-of-scenario and value-of-scenario.
The phrase is in fact a mutation of “Shut up and calculate”, a common stance pragmatical physicists take towards discussions of the interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Practical Reasoning Institute
Institute for Practical Reasoning
reasonable minds
untypicality*
rationality brigade
reason (insert word for group)
raison d’être
*(yes, I know, it is not technically a word)
names don’t have to be words already
Foundation for Human Sapience (or Foundation for Advanced Sapience)
Reality Transplantation Center
Thoughtful Organization
CORTEX—Center for Organized Rational Thinking and EXperimentation
OOPS—Organization for Optimal Perception Seekers
BAYES—Bureau for Advancing Yudkowsky’s Experiments in Sanity
How broad of a market are we aiming for? Is this intended to appeal mostly to people who know about and like “traditional rationality,” or to random corporations?
Suggestions:
Project Sanity
Center/Institute/Foundation for Applied Epistemology
Center/Institute/Foundation for Applied Sanity
Center/Institute/Foundation for Applied Thinking
Center/Institute/Foundation for Applied Thought
Meta-suggestion: I would really like if the word “Applied” was in there somewhere.
Human Rationality Institute
Human Reasoning Institute
Institute for Human Rationality (IHR).
Improving Rationality Institute.
Better Reasoning Institute.
The Center for the Advancement of Human Thought
Practical Epistemics Institute.
.
Other suggestions in the opaque-but-meaningful-to-the-ingroup category might include “Tsuyoku Naritai” and “Algernon”.
Any name optimized for ingroup recognition is likely to suffer the same issues as “Waterline” or “Less Wrong”, i.e. won’t mean much to outsiders.
My best tries:
Simple but boring
Mostly Rational
Decision Training
Minding Mind
Methods that Actually Work (MAW)
Too fancy
Technical Thinking Institute
Practical Problem Solving
Mental Floss / Mental Sharpener
Whatever Is Necessary (WIN)
Epistemic Voracity Dance
The Unfettered, Unwavering Path to Glorious Triumph!
Could trigger the knee-jerk reaction to “The ends always justify the means, stupid rabbit, durr!” and all such Rand-like screed that’s even now floating around in contrarian circles.
How you came up with “The ends always justify the means” as being “Rand-like” is beyond me.
It’s a stereotype of her thinking in America, no?
Selfishness (which is the American stereotype) != ends justify means.
Oh. Got it.
Clarity.
Say it out loud.
Cla-ri-tee.
Non-googleability is a minus.
The Illuminated Reason Institute
The Development of Reason and Rationality (DORR) Institute (it’s pleonastic but it sounds nice; could just use one of the Rs)
The Course Corrective Institute
The Moreright Institute
The Better Life Institute
(It’d be so much easier if it could have a German name.)
What would you name it if you could use German.
I didn’t have any specific examples in mind, I was just referring to how easily and meaningfully you can combine words in German to form a new word. See Rinderkennzeichnungs- und Rindfleischetikettierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz.
Too long-winded and pompous.
Which one? All of them?
Edit: Shouldn’t be any worries about having a long name where you can used an acronym. E.g., SETI (Search for extraterrestrial intelligence) institute.
The “The Whatever Institute” structure in general.
I got that structure from googling < institute>… There’s also The Institute for structure
:: Mind Chess ::
That’s the name that I’ve always called a manner of looking through the mind for routes that one has taken and routes that one may potentially take. We must be able to look ahead to see what all the myriad potentials of outcomes are before we make a decision. And a positively configured move will bring us closer to the position of our goal. It is a puzzle, it is a game, it is the outcome of success we seek. We all can do it! New manners of programming our minds simply and easily is the future, and it is what we need to breed harmonious creations, yeah!
A good first step in optimizing the world according to your wishes is noticing and acknowledging that you’ve got a problem.
With that in mind, why should the rational community frame its core activities — development of epistemic and acquisition of instrumental rationality, plus public advocacy of sanity — simply as another fun game to engage in, with an added benefit of warm fuzzies and making oneself feel smart?
Wouldn’t it be better to provoke a question, or, better yet, an acknowledgement — yes, I am (neurotypical) human, I am fallible (irrational), I wish I could become less wrong.
That’s why I’m proposing to have /Ir/rationality in the name. As for the name itself, I am at loss. I don’t see the benefit or adhering to some common naming convention as being substantial. How about “We, the Irrational Humans”? Humans, because I don’t envision any AGIs, swarms, extraterrestrials, chimps, squids, or dolphins joining us any time soon.
Live to win.
MoreRight i had this thought and apologize
Has anyone tried doing a mind map? They’re simple procedures that (specifically graphic) designers use to upstart creative thinking. You start with any word in the center relating to the problem you want solved (and all design is, is problem solving, mind) and then write out every term that you think of without self doubt. Though this link is referring more to the visual design applications of the method, it’s still really useful and is how my professor taught me. http://www.logodesignlove.com/images/books/Logo_Design_Love_free_chapter.pdf
On the other hand is the bucket system, which is a grid. You would write a topic above the columns (for example, words that bring to mind rationality) and vertically by the rows you title whatever the other portion of the problem is (in this case, organizations). Then after a set time, you look at where the columns and rows line up to try out the pairs of words together. It can be a little tedious, but it certainly helps narrow things down a bit, eh? I drew up a pic in MS Paint… http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j102/Kenztastic/Untitled-2.png
I hope this helps out a bit, guys. Personally, I like words such as anticipative, prudence, discerning...
Actually, has anyone said this one? “Center Forethought” ?
Humanity’s Potential
Sense Trust
Reach
Brightness Released
Grow Beyond
Coherent Life
Reflex Rational (or Rational Reflex)
Praxis Rational
Accurate Agency
The Accuracy Agency
Change Agent
Improved Metrics
Practical Measures
Better Measures
Measure Mental
Calibration
Making Sense
Percept Action
Precision Living
Truthward Ho!
Global Winning
Lonely Dissent
Fluidly
Cascade
Paperless
Subliminal Processing
Wordless Thought
Ratikata
LessWrong Dojo
Think Academy
(Thomas) Bayes Institute
More Right Institute
Right has political connotation in at least America, and I think most other english speaking countries as well.
I did not notice that as I thought of “More Right” as the synonym to “Less Wrong”. Do you have any viable alternative?
I considered “More Correct” but that doesn’t seem to work.
Neither “More Right” nor “More Correct” really work with the same connotations as “Less Wrong.”
Maybe “Less Wrong Institute” would be the way to go?
Mind The Mind
The Thomas Bayes Institute for Human Thought
Short: The Bayes Institute for Human Thought
Shorter: The Bayes Institute
The Center for Improving Human Thought
The Bayes Center for the Advancement of Human Reason
Smarten Up
Train Your Brain
Think Smarter
Truthseekers United
People for Clear thought
Practical Rationality
Fixed
Better Decision Making
Might be an interesting brand for the rationality katas, but does it work as an organizational name?
The Better Decision Making Academy.
I wonder whether it’s a significant downside if the organization’s name privileges one of epistemic and instrumental rationality over the other.
There is an organization called BetterInvesting.
I came here to post Thought Corrective but as I did I simultaneously wanted to shorten it to just Corrective and also realised that prisons are called corrective institutions, so I guess maybe not.
Too Orwellian/negative connotations.
I like it
The Meta Foundation
The Metafoundation
Institute for Applied Meta
Decision Techniques
Edit: Lol, these were all horrible, not just the culty ones. Organization names should be boring, not cute.
Belief Academy immediately pinged my “cult-dar”, although I’m not sure why.
Agreed.
Anything with “belief” in it would set up associations with religious beliefs of the “you just need to have faith” category.
Reality Seekers
Looking for Reality
Fountains of Light
The Optimizers
Wisdom
Next idea: take some phrases, translate them into Greek/Latin/both, fiddle around until we find something that sounds good as (all or part of) a name.
It could be worthwhile trying out the matrix of possibilities across languages given by pairing two nouns from the set {art, rationality, virtue, science, knowledge, practice, thinking, etc.}
Poor examples:
The Sophognosis Institute- “the knowledge of knowledge”
The Cognopraxis Institute- “the practice of thinking”
I like the concept of “to be rather than to seem” but am having trouble thinking of a name to convey it.
With reservation, here’s some suggestions:
Applied Coherence
Tangible Actualization
Decision Making Seminars
The Sanity Institute for Human Intelligence? (Haha, I’m joking.)
“Bayesian Illuminati” would likely pique my interest.
Noojo. (from nous + dojo)
Looks like No Jo.
“The Bayes-Jitsu Project”
Ok so you don’t like my name suggestion, but is it really bad enough to downvote in a thread specifically for wildly brainstorming random names?
I didn’t downvote it, but yeah, I think it’s horrid enough to downvote. Some names here are bland or misleading, but this name I’d be embarrassed to actually mention to others in the highly unlikely chance it got picked. It speaks of martial arts fetishization, and of adding random Japanese words because one thinks them cool—much like a fanboy/fangirl going “Kawai!” and “Baka!” because they learned these words from anime.
The Anti-Zombie Conspiracy
The Bayesian Conspiracy!
I noticed that I almost upvoted your post because it was an in-group thing to say and not because of its actual merit in this conversation. Having the word ‘conspiracy’ anywhere near the name of this organization would be a downright awful idea in practice. I’d as soon suggest changing the official LessWrong slogan to “We’re Not A Cult!”.
Why? It seems unlikely that a real conspiracy would label itself “conspiracy”, and promote itself under that name.
If you owned a restaurant, would you have menu items like “The Shit Sandwich”?
If I was in a restaurant with a menu item like that, I would consider ordering it just to see what it was.
(I take your point though.)
I don’t trust people to think that clearly. Plus, ‘conspiracy’ has negative connotations that are almost antithetical to evidence-based reasoning.
We will need better robes.
But it’s not secret. Bayesian Order maybe.
That is my favorite name so far.
It is an advantage for a name to include a word that has “juicy” connotations, in contrast with words like rationality, institute, decision, making, water, line, study, practical, critical, insight.
From the “Rationalists Dojo” meme:
One Boxing Gym
One Boxing (Has the rationality dojo feel. People can call themselves One Boxers. Tagline can be something like “The Sweeter Science.”)
Min, Max, Act. (again MMA has martial arts connection)
Mixed Mental Arts
Judge, Know, Do (JKD, same as Jeet Kune Do. If said fast it sounds a bit like an East Asian word.)
Think, Know, Decide (TKD Taekwondo)
24 Hour Mental Fitness
The Mind Organization (GET IT, GET IT?!)
The Mental Institute
or
The Eliezer Yudkowsky Mental Institute for Criminally Insane Artificial Intelligence Researchers
Funny. But useless. Don’t clog the thread with cutesy proposals. To avoid being unfair I’m going to go through the entire thread now and down-vote every single post with a cutesy/non-serious proposal.
Why is Less Wrong against humor? I am all for being professional—if all you are looking for his humor then you can go to reddit or something—but why should we be actively discouraging people from being funny at all? I’ve seen this in other communities, too. As much respect as I have for Eliezer (which is a lot), people tend to get all emotionally attached to the “hero” of their community/movement, and suddenly it becomes not ok to joke about the authorities or otherwise hint anything negative about them at all. Doesn’t go well with your whole “we’re not a cult” thing. Just saying.
Not sure about LW in general, but I don’t want to see humor on LW unless maybe if it’s exceptionally good. Humor seems to be toxic to thoughtful discussion. It’s not about Eliezer as a high value target, I feel the same way about humor aimed at anyone or anything else. A quote from Paul Graham discussing the deterioration of Reddit, among other things:
You have no idea how much I agree with this. I suspect a similar but smaller thing happens when people use emoticons.
I love a good laugh (it is, in fact, the only joy in my life right now), but LW is not the place for it. The instant someone makes a dumb joke here, which happens far more than it should, the entire thread and all surrounding threads plummet in signal to noise ratio.
And people always upvote comments that make them laugh, reinforcing the behavior. Unfunny joke comments usually do not settle into negative karma, usually garnering, like, 1-4. That’s no good, in my mind. It still positively reinforces unwanted behavior.
Err… It’s not. I have seen a few comments where people have lamented the fact that their most upvoted (by far) comment ever was a light-hearted joke, rather than one with some deep insight or otherwise useful contribution.
I didn’t downvote, but I don’t think people were necessarily downvoting because the names mildly insulted Eliezer. I’m guessing that just didn’t think they were very good names for an organisation attempting to improve the rationality of humanity. (e.g. the second one relates to AI far more than rationality.)
I’m not complaining about the downvotes, maybe people just didn’t think it was funny. I was just responding to the attitude Konkvistador expressed above (which is getting upvoted). So I’m not addressing something that doesn’t exist.
I think you need to read this thread.
Eliezer asked for help, not humour. The signal to noise ratio on this site has been deteriorating with the increased number of users (and consequently replies!). The marginal value of an additional joke compared to additional real content has been falling pretty rapidly.
Edit: I don’t mean to imply the average quality of contributors has declined, but merely the sheer increase in volume has reduced the marginal value of certain kinds of comments.
Are you possibly generalizing from one example/committing a fundamental attribution error?
I’m a non-native English speaker. Can you explain to me what’s the intended connotations for the sentence “just saying” here? Is someone supposed to be less offended by the potentially offensive previous statement?
“Just saying” / “I’m just sayin’”:
Urban Dictionary
Mark Liberman from Language Log
Scott Simon editorial from the radio show Weekend Edition Saturday
(Short version: Yes, you’ve basically got the intended meaning right, but this figure of speech has its detractors who don’t like its use as an all-purpose escape hatch. End of short version. For what it’s worth I’m not one of the aforementioned detractors. My translation of the phrase is: “What I just said was intended not as an insult or provocation, but as a factual observation, and I’m letting you know that in a mildly humorous way by using a current figure of speech.”)
Edit: Bonus fun link: Here’s the song “Punch Bowl” by Punch Brothers, which uses the “I’m not sayin’, I’m just sayin’” variant of this phrase.
Edit 2: My Mom says she only likes this phrase when it’s used by an animal.
Dude, don’t accuse Ben & Jerry’s of being a cult because they were brainstorming ice cream flavor names and you were chided for suggesting a sexual-sounding one.
Well I thought it was funny.