Eh. Wouldn’t it also be blasphemous to compare the mind of God to the mind of men?
I don’t know how Maimonides is viewed among Orthodox Jews, but his whole ineffability of God seems to cast serious doubt on the efficacy of any analysis built out of experience of human writers. Afterall, does anything in Orthodox Jewish belief preclude God from writing in multiple voices, styles, ideological agenda?
I imagine the blasphemy comes in when the authors suggest that the variation was due to variation in the “conduits” or “transmitters” of God’s chosen words.
I up-voted because:
Writing-style gives me a strong internal impression of clarity / comprehension. I enjoy this sensation and think it correlates with understanding, and so am trying to promote more of it.
Blue feels very soothing and I think contributes to the sensation of clarity / comprehension. I up-vote soothing sensation.
I like the possible direction this could take in terms of microeconomic utility, revealed preferences, and so on for understanding human intelligence. So my up-vote is payment for expected future ideas.