RSS

Repli­ca­tion Crisis

TagLast edit: Mar 18, 2023, 12:36 PM by Yoav Ravid

The Replication Crisis was the discovery that many fields of so-called science were producing experimental results that could not be replicated, because they were illusions resulting from bad statistical and experimental practices.

The replication crisis began in the early 2010s when several high-profile irreproducible results inspired mass replication attempts, revealing that the majority of papers checked in psychology and a number of other fields were not replicable. Some of the irreproducible results, like Priming, appeared to bear on rationality and were referenced in early LessWrong posts.

Related Pages: Practice & Philosophy of Science, Psychology, Information Cascades, Falsifiability

The Con­trol Group Is Out Of Control

Scott AlexanderApr 29, 2014, 12:46 AM
48 points
5 comments15 min readLW link

Psy­chol­ogy Repli­ca­tion Quiz

Ben PaceAug 31, 2018, 6:54 PM
46 points
9 comments1 min readLW link
(80000hours.org)

Adult Neu­ro­ge­n­e­sis – A Pointed Review

Scott AlexanderApr 5, 2018, 4:50 AM
55 points
17 comments11 min readLW link
(slatestarcodex.com)

The Death of Be­hav­ioral Economics

habrykaAug 22, 2021, 10:39 PM
155 points
24 comments1 min readLW link2 reviews
(www.thebehavioralscientist.com)

Un­known Knowns

ZviAug 28, 2018, 1:20 PM
120 points
17 comments2 min readLW link1 review
(thezvi.wordpress.com)

[Cross­post] On Hreha On Be­hav­ioral Economics

Scott AlexanderAug 31, 2021, 6:14 PM
106 points
6 comments22 min readLW link

Fol­low-up on ESP study: “We don’t pub­lish repli­ca­tions”

CarlShulmanJul 12, 2011, 8:48 PM
112 points
50 comments2 min readLW link

What we know about ma­chine learn­ing’s repli­ca­tion crisis

Younes KamelMar 5, 2022, 11:55 PM
36 points
4 comments6 min readLW link
(youneskamel.substack.com)

Never Leave Your Room

Scott AlexanderMar 18, 2009, 12:30 AM
83 points
65 comments3 min readLW link

What’s Wrong with So­cial Science and How to Fix It: Reflec­tions After Read­ing 2578 Papers

habrykaSep 12, 2020, 1:46 AM
107 points
22 comments2 min readLW link
(fantasticanachronism.com)

Schools Pro­lifer­at­ing Without Practicioners

Davis_KingsleyOct 26, 2018, 5:25 AM
32 points
46 comments1 min readLW link
(www.thelastrationalist.com)

The Jour­nal of (Failed) Repli­ca­tion Studies

Vladimir_GritsenkoAug 23, 2009, 9:15 AM
12 points
14 comments1 min readLW link

Good Sa­mar­i­tans in experiments

BuckyOct 30, 2018, 11:34 PM
125 points
14 comments9 min readLW link

Ex­tended Quote on the In­sti­tu­tion of Academia

Ben PaceMar 1, 2018, 2:58 AM
54 points
23 comments9 min readLW link

[Question] Come and day­dream with me about sci­ence reform

TeaTieAndHatJan 15, 2024, 11:09 AM
9 points
1 comment1 min readLW link

This is why we can’t have so­cial science

CostanzaJul 13, 2014, 9:04 PM
51 points
83 comments1 min readLW link

Para­psy­chol­ogy: the con­trol group for science

AllanCrossmanDec 5, 2009, 10:50 PM
96 points
188 comments2 min readLW link

Learn­ing To Love Scien­tific Consensus

Scott AlexanderSep 2, 2017, 8:44 AM
31 points
1 comment19 min readLW link

How to Fix Science

lukeprogMar 7, 2012, 2:51 AM
71 points
144 comments5 min readLW link

[link] Psy­chol­o­gists strike a blow for reproducibility

PabloNov 28, 2013, 5:26 AM
42 points
5 comments2 min readLW link

Linkpost: A Post Mortem on the Gino Case

LinchOct 24, 2023, 6:50 AM
89 points
7 comments2 min readLW link
(www.theorgplumber.com)

The Scent of Bad Psychology

Jacob FalkovichSep 10, 2018, 6:42 PM
42 points
6 comments1 min readLW link
(putanumonit.com)

Linkpost: They Stud­ied Dishon­esty. Was Their Work a Lie?

LinchOct 2, 2023, 8:10 AM
91 points
12 comments2 min readLW link
(www.newyorker.com)

[Link] Failed repli­ca­tions of the “el­derly walk­ing” prim­ing effect

MorendilMar 13, 2012, 7:55 AM
31 points
3 comments1 min readLW link

Help fore­cast study repli­ca­tion in this so­cial sci­ence pre­dic­tion market

rosiecamAug 7, 2019, 6:18 PM
29 points
3 comments1 min readLW link

[Link] So­cial in­ter­ven­tions gone wrong

[deleted]Aug 20, 2012, 9:24 AM
34 points
77 comments7 min readLW link

Statis­ti­cal er­ror in half of neu­ro­science papers

Paul CrowleySep 9, 2011, 11:07 PM
31 points
7 comments1 min readLW link

One Study, Many Re­sults (Matt Clancy)

aarongertlerJul 18, 2021, 11:10 PM
84 points
19 comments9 min readLW link
(mattsclancy.substack.com)

Towards a Bayesian model for Em­piri­cal Science

Yair HalberstadtOct 7, 2021, 5:38 AM
11 points
7 comments7 min readLW link

[link] Are All Dic­ta­tor Game Re­sults Ar­ti­facts?

Kaj_SotalaMay 23, 2013, 7:08 AM
24 points
8 comments2 min readLW link

I’m mildly skep­ti­cal that blind­ness pre­vents schizophrenia

Steven ByrnesAug 15, 2022, 11:36 PM
83 points
9 comments4 min readLW link

That one apoc­a­lyp­tic nu­clear famine pa­per is bunk

Lao MeinOct 12, 2022, 3:33 AM
110 points
10 comments1 min readLW link

How do you ac­tu­ally ob­tain and re­port a like­li­hood func­tion for sci­en­tific re­search?

Peter BerggrenFeb 11, 2024, 5:42 PM
55 points
4 comments1 min readLW link

Real­ity is Frac­tal-Shaped

silentbobDec 17, 2024, 1:52 PM
18 points
1 comment8 min readLW link

Why Are The Hu­man Sciences Hard? Two New Hypotheses

Mar 18, 2025, 3:45 PM
20 points
7 comments9 min readLW link

Wis­dom of the Crowd: not always so wise

tgbJul 1, 2012, 8:55 PM
33 points
20 comments2 min readLW link

A New In­ter­pre­ta­tion of the Marsh­mal­low Test

elharoJul 5, 2013, 12:22 PM
119 points
25 comments2 min readLW link

The Beauty of Set­tled Science

Eliezer YudkowskyMar 24, 2008, 5:30 AM
102 points
22 comments2 min readLW link

I Defy the Data!

Eliezer YudkowskyAug 11, 2007, 9:33 PM
103 points
12 comments3 min readLW link

Fun­nel plots: the study that didn’t bark, or, vi­su­al­iz­ing re­gres­sion to the null

gwernDec 4, 2011, 11:05 AM
69 points
35 comments2 min readLW link

Why epi­demiol­ogy will not cor­rect itself

gwernAug 11, 2011, 12:54 AM
70 points
13 comments1 min readLW link

Scien­tific mis­con­duct mis­di­ag­nosed be­cause of sci­en­tific misconduct

GLaDOSJun 10, 2011, 2:49 PM
64 points
55 comments2 min readLW link

Multiplicitous

Jacob FalkovichDec 18, 2016, 4:39 PM
9 points
0 comments12 min readLW link
(putanumonit.com)

The Pyra­mid And The Garden

Scott AlexanderNov 5, 2016, 6:03 AM
56 points
12 comments7 min readLW link

Deal­ing with the high quan­tity of sci­en­tific er­ror in medicine

NancyLebovitzOct 25, 2010, 1:53 PM
60 points
61 comments3 min readLW link

Be­ware of WEIRD psy­cholog­i­cal samples

Paul CrowleySep 13, 2009, 11:28 AM
46 points
28 comments1 min readLW link

Us­ing de­grees of free­dom to change the past for fun and profit

CarlShulmanMar 7, 2012, 2:51 AM
65 points
23 comments9 min readLW link

The “Spot the Fakes” Test

Scott AlexanderMar 17, 2009, 12:52 AM
64 points
18 comments3 min readLW link

How Should We Cri­tique Re­search? A De­ci­sion Perspective

gwernJul 14, 2019, 10:51 PM
46 points
4 comments1 min readLW link
(www.gwern.net)

[Link] “Fewer than X% of Amer­i­cans know Y”

NisanOct 10, 2012, 4:59 PM
70 points
23 comments1 min readLW link

What’s wrong with psy­chol­ogy, any­way?

Anatoly_VorobeyApr 28, 2012, 11:36 PM
43 points
15 comments1 min readLW link

[link] Why Psy­chol­o­gists’ Food Fight Matters

PabloAug 1, 2014, 7:52 AM
40 points
7 comments9 min readLW link

Ex­pert trap: Why is it hap­pen­ing? (Part 2 of 3) – how hind­sight, hi­er­ar­chy, and con­fir­ma­tion bi­ases break con­duc­tivity and ac­cu­racy of knowledge

Paweł SysiakJun 9, 2023, 11:00 PM
3 points
0 comments7 min readLW link

[link]Mass repli­ca­tion of Psy­chol­ogy ar­ti­cles planed.

beoShafferApr 18, 2012, 4:13 PM
41 points
8 comments1 min readLW link

Satire of Jour­nal of Per­son­al­ity and So­cial Psy­chol­ogy’s pub­li­ca­tion bias

CarlShulmanJun 5, 2012, 12:08 AM
43 points
7 comments1 min readLW link
No comments.