Paweł Sysiak

• Paweł Sysiak 10 Oct 2024 11:21 UTC

  1 point

  0

  on: List of Col­lec­tive In­tel­li­gence Projects

  I also gather the “Coordination and epistemic tools” resources https://​​www.pawel.world/​​Coordination-and-epistemic-tools-6508c74fbeaf4fbd8405c729993db3eb?pvs=4

• Paweł Sysiak 27 Feb 2024 2:15 UTC

  2 points

  0

  on: CFAR Take­aways: An­drew Critch

  What specifically does the author mean by lack of numeracy skills?

Ex­pert trap – Ways out (Part 3 of 3)

Ex­pert trap: Why is it hap­pen­ing? (Part 2 of 3) – how hind­sight, hi­er­ar­chy, and con­fir­ma­tion bi­ases break con­duc­tivity and ac­cu­racy of knowledge

Ex­pert trap: What is it? (Part 1 of 3) – how hind­sight, hi­er­ar­chy, and con­fir­ma­tion bi­ases break con­duc­tivity and ac­cu­racy of knowledge

To-do waves

• Paweł Sysiak 1 Jun 2022 7:32 UTC

  5 points

  in reply to: Alexander’s comment on: Alexan­der’s Shortform

  Elephant in the Brain influenced extensively ways I perceive social motivations. It is talking exactly about the same subject and mechanisms of why we don’t discern it in ourselves. If you didn’t read it you should check it out. It rewrote my views to the extent that I feel afraid to read “The status game” because it feels so easy to fall into confirmation bias here. This seems to me so active that I would love to read something opposite. Are there any good critiques of this view? Once I was listening to Frans de Waal’s lecture when he expressed this confusion that in primatology almost everything is explained through the hierarchy in the group. But when we listen to social scientists almost none of it is. Elephant in the brain. I think this is such an important topic.