RSS

Prob­a­bil­is­tic Reasoning

TagLast edit: Mar 19, 2022, 9:12 PM by brook

Probabilistic reasoning is the opposite of black and white thinking.

When you reason in black and white you ask questions like: Is this true? Is this the right thing to do? Am I sick?

When you reason probabilistically you ask questions like: How likely is this? What’s the expected value of this action? What evidence have I seen that I am sick, and what evidence that I’m not? How likely is it that I’m sick without taking any evidence into account?

Reasoning probabilistically allows you to change your mind incrementally, accumulating many small pieces of evidence rather than requiring one overwhelmingly convincing piece.

On LessWrong, ‘probabilistic reasoning’ usually refers to Bayes theorem, which formally defines the optimal way to change your beliefs when you see evidence.

See Also: Bayes Theorem, Belief Update, Expected Value, Probability and Statistics

Rad­i­cal Probabilism

abramdemskiAug 18, 2020, 9:14 PM
182 points
49 comments35 min readLW link1 review

Reflec­tive con­sis­tency, ran­dom­ized de­ci­sions, and the dan­gers of un­re­al­is­tic thought experiments

Radford NealDec 7, 2023, 3:33 AM
34 points
25 comments6 min readLW link

Up­date Your­self Incrementally

Eliezer YudkowskyAug 14, 2007, 2:56 PM
115 points
29 comments3 min readLW link

Beauty and the Bets

Ape in the coatMar 27, 2024, 6:17 AM
18 points
31 comments12 min readLW link

The Ev­i­dence for Ques­tion De­com­po­si­tion is Weak

niplavAug 28, 2023, 3:46 PM
22 points
6 comments5 min readLW link

Bayesian up­dat­ing in real life is mostly about un­der­stand­ing your hypotheses

Max HJan 1, 2024, 12:10 AM
63 points
4 comments11 min readLW link

A Bayesian Ag­gre­ga­tion Paradox

JsevillamolNov 22, 2021, 10:39 AM
87 points
23 comments7 min readLW link

Ab­solute Authority

Eliezer YudkowskyJan 8, 2008, 3:33 AM
110 points
78 comments7 min readLW link

“It’s a 10% chance which I did 10 times, so it should be 100%”

egor.timatkovNov 18, 2024, 1:14 AM
153 points
59 comments2 min readLW link

Gems from the Wiki: Do The Math, Then Burn The Math and Go With Your Gut

Sep 17, 2020, 10:41 PM
60 points
3 comments3 min readLW link
(www.lesswrong.com)

Fifty Flips

abstractapplicOct 1, 2023, 3:30 PM
33 points
15 comments1 min readLW link1 review
(h-b-p.github.io)

Pre­ci­sion of Sets of Forecasts

niplavSep 19, 2023, 6:19 PM
20 points
5 comments10 min readLW link

Con­di­tion­als All The Way Down

lunatic_at_largeSep 30, 2023, 9:06 PM
33 points
2 comments3 min readLW link

What makes a prob­a­bil­ity ques­tion “well-defined”? (Part I)

Noah TopperOct 2, 2022, 9:05 PM
14 points
4 comments7 min readLW link
(naivebayes.substack.com)

A new Heuris­tic to Up­date on the Cre­dences of Others

aaron_maiJan 21, 2023, 9:00 PM
6 points
0 comments20 min readLW link

[Question] What does it mean for an event or ob­ser­va­tion to have prob­a­bil­ity 0 or 1 in Bayesian terms?

Noosphere89Sep 17, 2024, 5:28 PM
1 point
22 comments1 min readLW link

On co­in­ci­dences and Bayesian rea­son­ing, as ap­plied to the ori­gins of COVID-19

viking_mathFeb 19, 2024, 1:14 AM
62 points
28 comments14 min readLW link

E.T. Jaynes Prob­a­bil­ity The­ory: The logic of Science I

Dec 27, 2023, 11:47 PM
63 points
20 comments21 min readLW link

Prob­a­bil­is­tic Payor Lemma?

abramdemskiMar 19, 2023, 5:57 PM
69 points
7 comments4 min readLW link

Is your un­cer­tainty re­solv­able?

RaemonJun 21, 2019, 7:32 AM
30 points
15 comments1 min readLW link

Why Not Subagents?

Jun 22, 2023, 10:16 PM
130 points
52 comments14 min readLW link1 review

You can’t be­lieve in Bayes

PhilGoetzJun 9, 2009, 6:03 PM
15 points
60 comments1 min readLW link

[Question] Jay­ne­sian in­ter­pre­ta­tion—How does “es­ti­mat­ing prob­a­bil­ities” make sense?

Haziq MuhammadJul 21, 2021, 9:36 PM
4 points
40 comments1 min readLW link

[Question] Halpern’s pa­per—A re­fu­ta­tion of Cox’s the­o­rem?

Haziq MuhammadAug 11, 2021, 9:25 AM
13 points
7 comments1 min readLW link

[Question] Has Van Horn fixed Cox’s the­o­rem?

Haziq MuhammadAug 29, 2021, 6:36 PM
9 points
1 comment1 min readLW link

[Question] Is LessWrong dead with­out Cox’s the­o­rem?

Haziq MuhammadSep 4, 2021, 5:45 AM
−2 points
89 comments1 min readLW link

Break­ing the SIA with an ex­po­nen­tially-Sleep­ing Beauty

0nautFeb 20, 2022, 8:03 AM
8 points
9 comments3 min readLW link

[Question] What is the most prob­a­ble AI?

Zeruel017Jun 20, 2022, 11:26 PM
−2 points
0 comments3 min readLW link

Five views of Bayes’ Theorem

Adam ScherlisJul 2, 2022, 2:25 AM
38 points
4 comments1 min readLW link

Prob­a­bil­is­tic rea­son­ing for de­scrip­tion and experience

Q HomeSep 27, 2022, 10:57 AM
0 points
0 comments26 min readLW link

A New Challenge to all Bayesi­ans!

milanroskoApr 2, 2025, 2:38 AM
−5 points
0 comments8 min readLW link

Dice De­ci­sion Making

Bart BussmannMar 10, 2023, 1:01 PM
20 points
14 comments3 min readLW link

[Question] Cur­rent State of Prob­a­bil­is­tic Logic

lunatic_at_largeOct 7, 2023, 5:06 AM
3 points
2 comments1 min readLW link

Boltz­mann brain’s con­di­tional probability

Marco DiscendentiDec 29, 2023, 2:44 PM
6 points
16 comments3 min readLW link

Every­thing Wrong with Roko’s Claims about an Eng­ineered Pandemic

WitheringWeightsFeb 22, 2024, 3:59 PM
93 points
10 comments16 min readLW link

Delta’s of Change

Jonas KgomoMar 19, 2024, 9:03 PM
1 point
0 comments4 min readLW link

What con­clu­sions can be drawn from a sin­gle ob­ser­va­tion about wealth in ten­nis?

Trevor CappalloDec 18, 2024, 9:55 AM
8 points
3 comments2 min readLW link

You Can­not Stop IT

No_Taro4331Jul 30, 2024, 3:00 AM
1 point
0 comments1 min readLW link

Fac­tor­ing P(doom) into a bayesian network

Joseph GardiOct 17, 2024, 5:55 PM
1 point
0 comments1 min readLW link

[Question] Are there more than 12 paths to Su­per­in­tel­li­gence?

p4rziv4lOct 18, 2024, 4:05 PM
−3 points
0 comments1 min readLW link

De­ci­sion-Mak­ing Un­der Uncer­tainty: Les­sons From AI

JonasbOct 22, 2024, 5:54 PM
−1 points
0 comments5 min readLW link
(www.denominations.io)

Meta AI (FAIR) lat­est pa­per in­te­grates sys­tem-1 and sys­tem-2 think­ing into rea­son­ing mod­els.

happy fridayOct 24, 2024, 4:54 PM
8 points
0 comments1 min readLW link

Doubt Certainty

RationalDinoNov 2, 2023, 5:43 PM
4 points
13 comments3 min readLW link

Some Rules for an Alge­bra of Bayes Nets

Nov 16, 2023, 11:53 PM
78 points
44 comments14 min readLW link1 review

Why I don’t think that the prob­a­bil­ity that AGI kills ev­ery­one is roughly 1 (but rather around 0.995).

BastumannenMay 30, 2023, 5:54 PM
−6 points
0 comments2 min readLW link

Draw­ing Two Aces

Eliezer YudkowskyJan 3, 2010, 10:33 AM
19 points
92 comments1 min readLW link

Kling, Prob­a­bil­ity, and Economics

mattMar 30, 2009, 5:15 AM
1 point
3 comments1 min readLW link

From game the­ory to play­ers theory

Victor PortonSep 15, 2023, 6:23 AM
−4 points
0 comments3 min readLW link

How Not to be Stupid: Adorable Maybes

Psy-KoshApr 29, 2009, 7:15 PM
1 point
55 comments3 min readLW link

No Univer­sal Prob­a­bil­ity Space

Gordon Seidoh WorleyMay 6, 2009, 2:58 AM
2 points
43 comments2 min readLW link

ra­tio­nal­is­tic prob­a­bil­ity(lit­ter­ally just throw­ing shit out there)

NotaSprayer ASprayerOct 4, 2023, 5:46 PM
−30 points
8 comments2 min readLW link

No One Knows Stuff

talismanMay 12, 2009, 5:11 AM
9 points
47 comments1 min readLW link