RSS

Consensus

TagLast edit: 26 Jan 2021 14:04 UTC by Yoav Ravid

A Consensus is a general or full agreement between members of a group. A consensus can be useful in deciding what’s true (e.g, a scientific consensus), or as a criteria in decision making. A False Consensus can happen when someone thinks a position is in consensus when it isn’t. one can also claim a consensus falsely to advance their position and make it difficult for others to oppose it. a False Controversy can happen when one mistakes something to not be in consensus when in fact it is. Claiming false controversies is a common way of creating uncertainty and doubt.

There are many things that are considered a consensus on LessWrong, even though they’re are not considered a consensus in the scientific community, such as: One-Boxing, cooperating on the Prisoner’s Dilemma, Bayesianism over frequentist probability (and more to be added)

Notable things that aren’t in consensus on LessWrong include Blackmail /​ Extortion, the benefits of rationality, AI Timelines and AI Takeoff, as well as AI alignment strategies,

Related Pages: Common Knowledge, Disagreement, Modesty, Modesty argument, Aumann agreement, Government (in the context of democracies), Contrarianism

See also: consensus on wikipedia

Learn­ing To Love Scien­tific Consensus

Scott Alexander2 Sep 2017 8:44 UTC
30 points
1 comment19 min readLW link

[Question] What Are Your Prefer­ences Re­gard­ing The FLI Let­ter?

JenniferRM1 Apr 2023 4:52 UTC
−4 points
122 comments16 min readLW link

Con­ver­sa­tion about paradigms, in­tel­lec­tual progress, so­cial con­sen­sus, and AI

5 Sep 2023 21:30 UTC
14 points
6 comments1 min readLW link

Knowl­edge Base 1: Could it in­crease in­tel­li­gence and make it safer?

iwis30 Sep 2024 16:00 UTC
−4 points
0 comments4 min readLW link

Re­quest for ad­vice: Re­search for Con­ver­sa­tional Game The­ory for LLMs

Rome Viharo16 Oct 2024 17:53 UTC
10 points
0 comments1 min readLW link

The Screen­play Method

Yeshua God24 Oct 2023 17:41 UTC
−15 points
0 comments25 min readLW link

Can AI Trans­form the Elec­torate into a Ci­ti­zen’s Assem­bly

RoscoHunter15 Aug 2023 17:52 UTC
−3 points
5 comments3 min readLW link

Knowl­edge Base 6: Con­sen­sus the­ory of truth

iwis3 Nov 2023 13:56 UTC
−8 points
0 comments1 min readLW link

Knowl­edge Base 2: The struc­ture and the method of building

iwis9 Oct 2023 11:53 UTC
2 points
4 comments7 min readLW link

Knowl­edge Base 8: The truth as an at­trac­tor in the in­for­ma­tion space

iwis25 Apr 2024 15:28 UTC
−8 points
0 comments2 min readLW link

Trust­ing Ex­pert Consensus

ChrisHallquist16 Oct 2013 20:22 UTC
41 points
81 comments17 min readLW link

[Question] Is there an aca­demic con­sen­sus around Rent Con­trol?

edoarad22 Jan 2021 16:18 UTC
3 points
14 comments1 min readLW link

In­di­vi­d­ual Ra­tion­al­ity Needn’t Gen­er­al­ize to Ra­tional Consensus

Akshat Mahajan4 May 2020 22:53 UTC
42 points
17 comments4 min readLW link

Every­body Knows

Zvi2 Jul 2019 12:20 UTC
137 points
21 comments4 min readLW link1 review
(thezvi.wordpress.com)

How Com­mon Are Science Failures?

Scott Alexander3 Jul 2014 1:36 UTC
24 points
9 comments5 min readLW link

How defer­en­tial should we be to the fore­casts of sub­ject mat­ter ex­perts?

VipulNaik14 Jul 2014 23:41 UTC
22 points
5 comments10 min readLW link

Why Democ­racy?

sxae14 May 2021 11:02 UTC
14 points
7 comments14 min readLW link

Afri­can Wild Dogs Vote By Sneez­ing—Can AI Help Us Do Bet­ter?

Augmented Assembly6 Feb 2023 21:09 UTC
10 points
6 comments4 min readLW link

Quan­tum Dar­winism, so­cial con­structs, and the sci­en­tific method

pchvykov7 Feb 2024 7:04 UTC
6 points
12 comments9 min readLW link

Knowl­edge Base 7: Long-tail knowl­edge and col­lec­tive intelligence

iwis18 Apr 2024 14:21 UTC
−6 points
0 comments1 min readLW link
No comments.