A prospect theory agent tasked with a decision first sets it within a frame with a convenient zero point, allowing em to classify the results of the decision as either losses or gains. Ey then computes a subjective expected utility, where the subjective expected utility equals the subjective value times the subjective probability.
If a person objects to singular they, I’m having a hard time seeing them not objecting to this. So why not just use singular they? It’d make this a lot more readable.
I’ve been meaning to make a post about this small procedural note. Singular they has a long history in English as a gender-neutral third person singular pronoun. Languages tend to resist the introduction of new pronouns, as they’re “closed class”—part of the language’s grammar. It’s especially problematic that nobody can even agree on which invented pronoun to get behind!
Can’t we all just use singular they? It’s much nicer.
Okay, okay, I’ll use singular they if you all promise that the first time someone pompously chides me for using “they” in the singular, you’ll give them at least as much trouble as you’re giving me for using gender-neutral third person pronouns.
Indeed I shall so chide. It’s not so much that “ey” and the like bother me, it’s mostly that Less Wrong might become one of the first communities where people can use singular they without flinching due to vague anticipation of undue contempt. Such trivial inconveniences add up very quickly for a certain kind of mind, like mine.
Question for the formally qualified grammarian: When using singular “they”, which is correct?
“When a person is biased, they make mistakes”
“When a person is based, they makes mistakes”
The second sounds absolutely horrible, but if singular “they” is really being used as a singular in the same sense as “he” or “she”, it sounds like it ought to be correct.
Have a gander at Language Log where the “singular they” has been extensively discussed—mostly, apparently, because it’s something of a litmus test to determine whether someone is a descriptivist or a prescriptivist grammarian; the LL crowd falling squarely in the descriptivist camp.
The short answer is that it’s grammatically plural; it’s a “plural of indeterminacy of number” primarily, and has taken on under social pressure an aspect of “plural of indeterminacy of gender”. Number one is correct.
If a person objects to singular they, I’m having a hard time seeing them not objecting to this. So why not just use singular they? It’d make this a lot more readable.
I’ve been meaning to make a post about this small procedural note. Singular they has a long history in English as a gender-neutral third person singular pronoun. Languages tend to resist the introduction of new pronouns, as they’re “closed class”—part of the language’s grammar. It’s especially problematic that nobody can even agree on which invented pronoun to get behind!
Can’t we all just use singular they? It’s much nicer.
Okay, okay, I’ll use singular they if you all promise that the first time someone pompously chides me for using “they” in the singular, you’ll give them at least as much trouble as you’re giving me for using gender-neutral third person pronouns.
Indeed I shall so chide. It’s not so much that “ey” and the like bother me, it’s mostly that Less Wrong might become one of the first communities where people can use singular they without flinching due to vague anticipation of undue contempt. Such trivial inconveniences add up very quickly for a certain kind of mind, like mine.
Well, I don’t anticipate undue contempt when using the singular they on Language Log, either. :-)
Deal. I’ll even pull rank with my formal qualifications on English grammar, should they care about that.
Question for the formally qualified grammarian: When using singular “they”, which is correct?
“When a person is biased, they make mistakes”
“When a person is based, they makes mistakes”
The second sounds absolutely horrible, but if singular “they” is really being used as a singular in the same sense as “he” or “she”, it sounds like it ought to be correct.
Consider:
When you, Yvain, are biased, you make mistakes
Clearly in the 2nd person singular, the verb displays “plural” agreement. It’s the same for “they”.
Have a gander at Language Log where the “singular they” has been extensively discussed—mostly, apparently, because it’s something of a litmus test to determine whether someone is a descriptivist or a prescriptivist grammarian; the LL crowd falling squarely in the descriptivist camp.
The short answer is that it’s grammatically plural; it’s a “plural of indeterminacy of number” primarily, and has taken on under social pressure an aspect of “plural of indeterminacy of gender”. Number one is correct.
ETA: background info.
I like singular they, but I also think ze is better than ey because it looks less like a cut-off other word
I agree. Singular they is so awesome.