RSS

Nar­row AI

TagLast edit: 4 Aug 2023 8:04 UTC by steven0461

A Narrow AI is capable of operating only in a relatively limited domain, such as chess or driving, rather than capable of learning a broad range of tasks like a human or an Artificial General Intelligence. Narrow vs General is not a perfectly binary classification: there are degrees of generality with, for example, large language models having a fairly large degree of generality (as the domain of text is large) without being as general as a human, and we may eventually build systems that are significantly more general than humans.

Strate­gies for keep­ing AIs nar­row in the short term

Rossin9 Apr 2022 16:42 UTC
9 points
3 comments3 min readLW link

[Question] Are there sub­stan­tial re­search efforts to­wards al­ign­ing nar­row AIs?

Rossin4 Sep 2021 18:40 UTC
11 points
4 comments2 min readLW link

A sum­mary of al­ign­ing nar­rowly su­per­hu­man models

gugu10 Feb 2022 18:26 UTC
8 points
0 comments8 min readLW link

Refram­ing Su­per­in­tel­li­gence: Com­pre­hen­sive AI Ser­vices as Gen­eral Intelligence

Rohin Shah8 Jan 2019 7:12 UTC
122 points
77 comments5 min readLW link2 reviews
(www.fhi.ox.ac.uk)

The al­gorithm isn’t do­ing X, it’s just do­ing Y.

Cleo Nardo16 Mar 2023 23:28 UTC
53 points
43 comments5 min readLW link

In­tro­duc­ing Leap Labs, an AI in­ter­pretabil­ity startup

Jessica Rumbelow6 Mar 2023 16:16 UTC
103 points
12 comments1 min readLW link

Could util­ity func­tions be for nar­row AI only, and down­right an­ti­thet­i­cal to AGI?

chaosmage16 Mar 2017 18:24 UTC
9 points
38 comments5 min readLW link

Nar­row AI Nanny: Reach­ing Strate­gic Ad­van­tage via Nar­row AI to Prevent Creation of the Danger­ous Superintelligence

avturchin25 Jul 2018 17:12 UTC
12 points
7 comments21 min readLW link

Some thoughts on risks from nar­row, non-agen­tic AI

Richard_Ngo19 Jan 2021 0:04 UTC
35 points
21 comments16 min readLW link

AIOS

samhealy31 Dec 2023 13:23 UTC
−3 points
5 comments6 min readLW link

Rele­vant pre-AGI possibilities

Daniel Kokotajlo20 Jun 2020 10:52 UTC
38 points
7 comments19 min readLW link
(aiimpacts.org)

[Question] Danger(s) of the­o­rem-prov­ing AI?

Yitz16 Mar 2022 2:47 UTC
8 points
8 comments1 min readLW link

[Question] Con­strain­ing nar­row AI in a cor­po­rate setting

MaximumLiberty15 Apr 2022 22:36 UTC
28 points
4 comments1 min readLW link

Misal­ign­ment Harms Can Be Caused by Low In­tel­li­gence Systems

DialecticEel11 Oct 2022 13:39 UTC
11 points
3 comments1 min readLW link

The re­ward func­tion is already how well you ma­nipu­late humans

Kerry19 Oct 2022 1:52 UTC
20 points
9 comments2 min readLW link

[LINK]s: Who says Wat­son is only a nar­row AI?

Shmi21 May 2013 18:04 UTC
6 points
27 comments1 min readLW link

Skep­ti­cism About Deep­Mind’s “Grand­mas­ter-Level” Chess Without Search

Arjun Panickssery12 Feb 2024 0:56 UTC
55 points
13 comments3 min readLW link

The de­fault sce­nario for the next 50 years

Julien24 Nov 2024 14:01 UTC
1 point
0 comments6 min readLW link

GPT-4 is bad at strate­gic thinking

Christopher King27 Mar 2023 15:11 UTC
22 points
8 comments1 min readLW link

We don’t need AGI for an amaz­ing future

Karl von Wendt4 May 2023 12:10 UTC
18 points
32 comments5 min readLW link