Also, very disappointed about the skipping of about a month or so there. If Eliezer doesn’t explicitly fill in the gaps, I’m considering writing a MoR fanfic (tentatively titled “MoR: Battle School”) after at least the wars are over and intervening events are solidified, to fill in that time.
Go for it. Most people complain about the pace being too slow—I think you might even be the first to complain about it being too fast—but that’s certainly one way to fix it, if you’re inspired with the vision of a battle. There’s a chance though hardly a certainty that I would answer questions before you wrote, or declare the story canon afterward.
Well I hadn’t been complaining about the pacing before, so the sudden jump over a significant period seemed wrong. Surely these people would have done all sorts of interesting learning / use of magic over the course of the battles, and Harry and Draco would have been doing science to it, and there would have been interesting developments in Quirrell’s classes.
Thanks for the offer—I will surely pester you with questions when I get around to it.
As a term for fanfiction of fanfiction of fanfiction, I don’t think it’s a good one. I mean, as awesome as paperclips are, if we called everything “paperclips” it might get a little confusing. I suggested “crumbs” because that’s what’s left after you eat a cookie, but I’m not seeing what this has to do with paperclips.
I thought it might help promote paperclip awareness, but now I agree with your reasonable point about saturating terminology for everything with the same word, and the confusion it would generate.
Your thought processes are getting better too! c=@
Great discovery! Do you know of glyphs I can use in your encoding scheme that resemble an unbent or broken paperclip, for when I want to express negative emotions? (“Emotions” in the de-anthropomorphized sense, of course.)
Ch. 33:
The three-way tie, while clearly dramatically convenient for Eliezer, and adequately foreshadowed, is just so boring.
Was anyone else briefly confused because they had forgotten that the war was continuing even after the awarding of the Christmas Wish?
Re 2: Yes, I’d forgotten that as well.
Also, very disappointed about the skipping of about a month or so there. If Eliezer doesn’t explicitly fill in the gaps, I’m considering writing a MoR fanfic (tentatively titled “MoR: Battle School”) after at least the wars are over and intervening events are solidified, to fill in that time.
Go for it. Most people complain about the pace being too slow—I think you might even be the first to complain about it being too fast—but that’s certainly one way to fix it, if you’re inspired with the vision of a battle. There’s a chance though hardly a certainty that I would answer questions before you wrote, or declare the story canon afterward.
Well I hadn’t been complaining about the pacing before, so the sudden jump over a significant period seemed wrong. Surely these people would have done all sorts of interesting learning / use of magic over the course of the battles, and Harry and Draco would have been doing science to it, and there would have been interesting developments in Quirrell’s classes.
Thanks for the offer—I will surely pester you with questions when I get around to it.
Phrase recognised, giggling performed.
Now I want biscuits.
You mean biscuits.
Yes.
I believe it is customary to call fanfiction of fanfiction “cookies”.
In the case of HP fanfiction, that should be “biscuits”.
So could we then call fanfiction of fanfiction of fanfiction “crumbs”?
I guess. Or “chips”, maybe.
What do you think about paperclips?
In general? Or as a term for fanfiction of fanfiction of fanfiction?
Both, of course. Though, in the context of this topic, only the latter is relevant.
As a term for fanfiction of fanfiction of fanfiction, I don’t think it’s a good one. I mean, as awesome as paperclips are, if we called everything “paperclips” it might get a little confusing. I suggested “crumbs” because that’s what’s left after you eat a cookie, but I’m not seeing what this has to do with paperclips.
I thought it might help promote paperclip awareness, but now I agree with your reasonable point about saturating terminology for everything with the same word, and the confusion it would generate.
Your thought processes are getting better too! c=@
For your information, Clippy, a paperclip can be rendered fairly adequately in Unicode with ⊂≣⊇ (depending on the font, of course).
⊂≣⊇ (I pasted the unicode, not the html escapes)
Great discovery! Do you know of glyphs I can use in your encoding scheme that resemble an unbent or broken paperclip, for when I want to express negative emotions? (“Emotions” in the de-anthropomorphized sense, of course.)
All I have now is stuff like c=/ and (_/.
⊂≣⊇ does not bear sufficient similarity to a paperclip.
User:Douglas_Knight’s glyphs are better.
Thank you! You are a good paperclipper. c=@ ⊂≣⊇
Re 1: It would work better if I hadn’t had to wait a week to see it. Such is the difficulty with installment fiction.