Yeah I’m not too confident about it, i did not spend time looking into it. But I think it is >30% likely you can compensate for past over or under estimations.
But I think it is >30% likely you can compensate for past over or under estimations.
I’d bet against that at 1:5, i.e., against the proposition that the optimal forecast is not subject to your previous history
Yeah I’m not too confident about it, i did not spend time looking into it. But I think it is >30% likely you can compensate for past over or under estimations.
I’d bet against that at 1:5, i.e., against the proposition that the optimal forecast is not subject to your previous history