What should I do if there’s a post that I want to give −1 to (“Misleading, harmful or unimportant”), but actually think it’s important to have it in the review because it was a prominent post?
This makes me think it would be fun to explore the idea of having a “Mistakes Review”, or something. An annual reflection on things that the community got wrong or changed its mind about.
Hmm. So the current intent is “at least two people need to think a thing is good in order to be worth prioritizing in the review.”
You can temporarily vote it at +1 and change your vote later, if you think it’s important to get it into the review phase. But if no one is upvoting it I think it’s also fine for the review process to be “well, it turns out nobody thought this thing was important 2 years later, even if they thought it was important at the time.”
What should I do if there’s a post that I want to give −1 to (“Misleading, harmful or unimportant”), but actually think it’s important to have it in the review because it was a prominent post?
This makes me think it would be fun to explore the idea of having a “Mistakes Review”, or something. An annual reflection on things that the community got wrong or changed its mind about.
Hmm. So the current intent is “at least two people need to think a thing is good in order to be worth prioritizing in the review.”
You can temporarily vote it at +1 and change your vote later, if you think it’s important to get it into the review phase. But if no one is upvoting it I think it’s also fine for the review process to be “well, it turns out nobody thought this thing was important 2 years later, even if they thought it was important at the time.”