Hmm. So the current intent is “at least two people need to think a thing is good in order to be worth prioritizing in the review.”
You can temporarily vote it at +1 and change your vote later, if you think it’s important to get it into the review phase. But if no one is upvoting it I think it’s also fine for the review process to be “well, it turns out nobody thought this thing was important 2 years later, even if they thought it was important at the time.”
Hmm. So the current intent is “at least two people need to think a thing is good in order to be worth prioritizing in the review.”
You can temporarily vote it at +1 and change your vote later, if you think it’s important to get it into the review phase. But if no one is upvoting it I think it’s also fine for the review process to be “well, it turns out nobody thought this thing was important 2 years later, even if they thought it was important at the time.”