I agree with points 2 and 3. But I think it’s only really a counter for the equivalency between AI and human-brain-baring systems. I think the article in itself stands in spite of that. (See my other comments, especially the one in reply to Daniel Kokotajlo>
I’m just gonna leave this here and highlight points 2 and 3.
I agree with points 2 and 3. But I think it’s only really a counter for the equivalency between AI and human-brain-baring systems. I think the article in itself stands in spite of that. (See my other comments, especially the one in reply to Daniel Kokotajlo>