It was a weird listen. Rohit (non-exclusively) makes lots of true and useful statements. [...] Thus, Rohin perhaps assumes we must think these systems will otherwise not change, because any changes would obviously make things better on every dimension.
Rohit and Rohin are two very different people.
Are you going to summarize Paul’s talk on heuristic arguements?
And also, how much do you think the market is undervaluing Alphabet?
I am not going to summarize Paul’s talk—I don’t think the summary is worth much, you should either see it or not see it?
On value [not investment advice] in expectation I think the answer to all the key players in AI is ‘a lot.’ I don’t have a target number or anything, it’s a case where the market needs to be at insane-looking numbers (think Tesla) or it doesn’t make sense.
Rohit and Rohin are two very different people.
Are you going to summarize Paul’s talk on heuristic arguements?
And also, how much do you think the market is undervaluing Alphabet?
Fixed the name issue, thanks.
I am not going to summarize Paul’s talk—I don’t think the summary is worth much, you should either see it or not see it?
On value [not investment advice] in expectation I think the answer to all the key players in AI is ‘a lot.’ I don’t have a target number or anything, it’s a case where the market needs to be at insane-looking numbers (think Tesla) or it doesn’t make sense.