There’s overlap; the Piranha theorem gives you a tradeoff between frequency and effect size. But it’s missing the part where logarithmic perception means you only care about the rare factors with large effect and not the common factors with small effect.
I think you’re getting at something fairly close to the Piranha theorem from a different (ecological?) angle.
There’s overlap; the Piranha theorem gives you a tradeoff between frequency and effect size. But it’s missing the part where logarithmic perception means you only care about the rare factors with large effect and not the common factors with small effect.