What specific kinds of ideas are making this problem noticeable?
Are you talking about conveying specialist knowledge to a lay-audience—for example, good luck trying to get me to understand what an Eigenvector is or the points system in Cricket—I’ve tried. Likewise, to explain to a friend what Sub-Surface scattering was, I first had to introduce him to the mechanics of Ray Tracing. Luckily he was a musician so I could just use analogies to the diffusion and travel of sound waves.
Or are you talking about more personal preferences and experiences, for example recently someone asked me “why do you prefer to be behind the camera rather than a performer in front of it?”—apparently they thought I was such a ham I should be a comedian not a director—I didn’t know where to even begin. Likewise many people who “kind of fell into doing this” for their current profession will stumble if you ask them how they “got into it” because there’s often a meandering narrative and confused chronology because even to themselves it’s not clear.
Another question I have is—are there any patterns in the assumptions, misunderstandings or tangents which people you’re trying to explain exhibit in reaction to your explanations?
I started a AI club at my high school last year, and I’ve been (slowly) trying to teach other students the basics of deep learning. They generally come out of my 15-to-20 minute-long explanations confused, rather than understanding.
This too (I don’t have a specific example in mind—I’ll see if any pop up during school tomorrow)
I normally think what I’m saying is clear, but the result is that others don’t understand what I mean when I finish saying it—which causes me to tack on hasty clarifications of my intentions / ideas.
What kind of questions, analogies, or models are your fellow students responding to your explanations with? Are there any patterns in the specific feedback you’ve noticed? Are there any particular aspects of Deep Learning or the metaphors or terminology you’re using that seem to be the biggest bottlenecks?
My hunch is that maybe you instead look at beginner’s introductions to Deep Learning and Neural Networks and see how they go about conveying these concepts. If someone else has done the hard work of figuring out an expedient way to convey the subject matter, why not borrow from them (giving credit, of course)?
Please do get back if you can think of specific examples of the second case and I’ll think any books or resources I know of which might be suitable.
There were 3 situations today where the second case arose:
I asked whether GTP was less stable than ATP in AP Bio (I wanted to understand how it was possible that GTP + ADP → GDP + ATP, and if this was the case, why ATP was used at all). My teacher thought I was asking about it from an evolutionary standpoint, and started explaining the evolution of the system.
I have a tendency to speak in short bursts of content in which I think I often underestimate inferential distances. (My internal monologue normally consists of vaguely used phrases + a sense of what I mean, which I think this carries over into my speech).
I’m realizing that I find it difficult to phrase sentences correctly. I rewrite almost every sentence I type many times over because I’m not sure about grammar and word arrangement (I spent a minute thinking about whether I should wrap “many times over” in a pair of commas at the start of this sentence).
I’m so sorry but I haven’t been able to think of any specific books, although the first case it seems like your problem could be a matter of the Availability Heuristic—your teacher answered a different question to the one you asked because quite simply it was easier for them to recall the knowledge about the evolution of the system than the relative stability of GTP to ATP.
I’m not sure if there is anything in Kahneman’s Thinking Fast, Slow which might offer your practical techniques for priming listeners the right way. If anything you might be better served by the books of Robert Cialdini or even literature on sales—my thinking here is sales people often think about the structure (or in Aristotelian terms the Kairos) that they present different options which in effect ‘primes’ the customer to different Semantic and Mental frameworks.
Sorry that I can’t point to any specific books. I could guess on some specific techniques that I think might aid your communication but I’ve been wracking my brain and can’t think of any books that I know hit the mark.
What specific kinds of ideas are making this problem noticeable?
Are you talking about conveying specialist knowledge to a lay-audience—for example, good luck trying to get me to understand what an Eigenvector is or the points system in Cricket—I’ve tried. Likewise, to explain to a friend what Sub-Surface scattering was, I first had to introduce him to the mechanics of Ray Tracing. Luckily he was a musician so I could just use analogies to the diffusion and travel of sound waves.
Or are you talking about more personal preferences and experiences, for example recently someone asked me “why do you prefer to be behind the camera rather than a performer in front of it?”—apparently they thought I was such a ham I should be a comedian not a director—I didn’t know where to even begin.
Likewise many people who “kind of fell into doing this” for their current profession will stumble if you ask them how they “got into it” because there’s often a meandering narrative and confused chronology because even to themselves it’s not clear.
Another question I have is—are there any patterns in the assumptions, misunderstandings or tangents which people you’re trying to explain exhibit in reaction to your explanations?
Actually, both.
I started a AI club at my high school last year, and I’ve been (slowly) trying to teach other students the basics of deep learning. They generally come out of my 15-to-20 minute-long explanations confused, rather than understanding.
This too (I don’t have a specific example in mind—I’ll see if any pop up during school tomorrow)
I normally think what I’m saying is clear, but the result is that others don’t understand what I mean when I finish saying it—which causes me to tack on hasty clarifications of my intentions / ideas.
Thank you for the reply.
What kind of questions, analogies, or models are your fellow students responding to your explanations with? Are there any patterns in the specific feedback you’ve noticed? Are there any particular aspects of Deep Learning or the metaphors or terminology you’re using that seem to be the biggest bottlenecks?
My hunch is that maybe you instead look at beginner’s introductions to Deep Learning and Neural Networks and see how they go about conveying these concepts. If someone else has done the hard work of figuring out an expedient way to convey the subject matter, why not borrow from them (giving credit, of course)?
Please do get back if you can think of specific examples of the second case and I’ll think any books or resources I know of which might be suitable.
Thank you for your response!
There were 3 situations today where the second case arose:
I asked whether GTP was less stable than ATP in AP Bio (I wanted to understand how it was possible that GTP + ADP → GDP + ATP, and if this was the case, why ATP was used at all). My teacher thought I was asking about it from an evolutionary standpoint, and started explaining the evolution of the system.
I have a tendency to speak in short bursts of content in which I think I often underestimate inferential distances. (My internal monologue normally consists of vaguely used phrases + a sense of what I mean, which I think this carries over into my speech).
I’m realizing that I find it difficult to phrase sentences correctly. I rewrite almost every sentence I type many times over because I’m not sure about grammar and word arrangement (I spent a minute thinking about whether I should wrap “many times over” in a pair of commas at the start of this sentence).
I’m so sorry but I haven’t been able to think of any specific books, although the first case it seems like your problem could be a matter of the Availability Heuristic—your teacher answered a different question to the one you asked because quite simply it was easier for them to recall the knowledge about the evolution of the system than the relative stability of GTP to ATP.
I’m not sure if there is anything in Kahneman’s Thinking Fast, Slow which might offer your practical techniques for priming listeners the right way. If anything you might be better served by the books of Robert Cialdini or even literature on sales—my thinking here is sales people often think about the structure (or in Aristotelian terms the Kairos) that they present different options which in effect ‘primes’ the customer to different Semantic and Mental frameworks.
Sorry that I can’t point to any specific books. I could guess on some specific techniques that I think might aid your communication but I’ve been wracking my brain and can’t think of any books that I know hit the mark.