Utilitarian* atheist, artist, coder, documentarian and polymath (jokes.. but I don’t believe to be a jack of all trades necessitates one being a master of none, rather that the synergy of many fields can lead to novel insights—and I also just want to know everything!).
I write about moral philosophy, artificial intelligence and game theory—in particular non-zero-sum games and their importance in solving the world’s problems. Most of my writing originates on my personal website nonzerosum.games.
I have admitted I am wrong at least 10 times on the internet.
* I don’t really class Utilitarianism as an ethical framework in competition with other ethical frameworks, I see it more as a calculus that most people, when it comes down to it, use to determine or assess more the generalised virtues, principles and laws that they live by (well, at least I do).
Thanks for your comment. In workshopping this post, I definitely need to work on clarity :) I certainly wasn’t meaning to refer to life-extension—I’m meaning the state of the world as it is, where we (most of us at least) don’t find it acceptable to let people die of starvation from poverty (as evolution would have us do).
I’ll add couple of edits now just to clarify that, as you’re not the first person that wasn’t clear to.