Is there any Egan or Vinge fanfic except EY’s crossover Finale of the...?
Gvaerg
Karma: 206
Thanks! I’ve seen many times the statement that ontology is strictly included in metaphysics, but this is the first time I’ve seen an example of something that’s in the set-theoretic difference.
Did the survey! I think i gave highly contradictory answers.
I think the anagram-of-your-name thing works better if you’re called Scott Alexander than if you’re called Viliam Bur.
Or Hyaena Hell Infusion.
Nice to see an old face again!
This should be fun!
Distress—it’s like the kitchen sink of hard/near-future SF
Quarantine—very enjoyable, but a bit simple-minded
Incandescence—seems like a return to early Egan’s minimalism
Permutation City—cool, but rather off for me
Schild’s Ladder—doesn’t feel innovative, the ending has the same vibe as that of Permutation
Zendegi—was expecting more LW mockery after the discussions, unfortunately it was very limited
Diaspora—although brilliant in some respects, very confusingly written
Teranesia—just boring, I understand why it’s not so known
Haven’t read yet An Unusual Angle; the Orthogonal trilogy I’ll read when I get it whole.
“After all this time?”
“Always.”
This happened when I was 12 years old. I was trying to solve a problem at a mathematical contest which involved proving some identity with the nth powers of 5 and 7. I recall thinking vaguely “if you go to n+1 what is added in the left hand side is also in the right hand side” and so I discovered mathematical induction. In ten minutes I had a rigorous proof. Though, I didn’t find it so convincing, so I ended with an unsure-of-myself comment “Hence, it is also valid for 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on...”
When I was in high school, creationism seemed unsatisfying in the sense of a Deus Ex Machina narrative (I often wonder how theists reconcile the contradiction between the feeling of religious wonder and the feeling of disappointment when facing Deus Ex Machina endings). The evolution “story” fascinated me with its slow and semi-random progression over billions of years. I guess this was my first taste of reductionism. (This is also an example of how optimizing for interestingness instead of truth has led me to the correct answer.)
Okay, fixed. IMHO it would make more sense to rot13 hereditarily.
I’m wondering what Salazar would make of Bane’s Rule of Two
Does anyone know why Stephen Bond’s website is down? It’s been so for something like a month.
Wildbow at least explicitly puts forth metaphysics to partially explain the narrative causality.
And that was the final piece of the puzzle in getting me to read Worm. Off I go!
[deleted]
Marker is the closest to the state of the art. Hodges is a bit verbose and for beginners. Poizat is a little idiosyncratic (just look at the Introduction!).
I am also interested in the basis of MIRI’s recommendation. Perhaps they are not too connected to actual mathematicians studying it, as model theory is pretty much a fringe topic.
I don’t deny that, I just say that maybe the specific environment doesn’t suit everyone.
Well, some rationalists aren’t so capitalism-oriented.
Thanks! Given that that site lists Egan (and other works that I knew about) and it strives to be complete, it seems it’s what I had been looking for.
What examples can you give of books that contain discussions of advanced (graduate or research-level) mathematics, similar to what Greg Egan does in his novels (I suppose the majority of such books are hard sci-fi, though I’m not betting on it)? I’m trying to find out what has already been done in the area.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb.