Human alignment: chrislakin.com/bounty
Chipmonk
hmm i suspect releasing these metrics could make my customers significantly more annoying. like, early adopters are fun and experimental. but if i make it seem not risky then i get risk-averse people who tend to be prickly
so maybe i will compile and release this data but i would need to figure out how to do it in a way that doesn’t change the funnel
Any updates on this?
Any updates on this?
I wonder if you could set up a conditional donation? “I donate $X, minus if total donations exceed $3M”
The case for pay-on-results coaching
i like this thanks. might take a bit of time to put together but interested
made some light edits because of this comment, thanks
oh ok i might start doing that. knowing my calibration on that would be nice
oh ok hm. i also don’t want to be incentivized to not give easy-for-me help to people with low odds of success though
could you give a few examples?
also seems time-intensive hmmmm
also, i thought about it more and i really like the metric of “results generated per hour”
:D i really hope bounties catch on
wow this is contraversial (my own vote is +6)
wonder why
Began a pay-on-results coaching experiment, made $40,300 since July
One-sentence summary: Formalise one piece of morality: the causal separation between agents and their environment. See also Open Agency Architecture.
Theory of change: Formalise (part of) morality/safety, solve outer alignment.
Chris Lakin here—this is a very old post and What does davidad want from «boundaries»? should be the canonical link
Why SPY over QQQ?
available on the website at least
Update: Bob has recorded a 6-month follow-up here.
Why was this post tagged as boundaries/membranes? I’m inclined to remove the tag.
makes sense
Aside: I’m surprised you’re suggesting
people get validation --> people feel secure
? This does not at all seem like the causality to me (though I’m aware most people probably think like this).Prediction: In the absence of radically improved psychotechnology, a significant fraction of people will always find a way to feel insecure.