I meant in a way that with the progress of more artificial intelligence (Demis Hassabis genuinely belives the fact we can solve all problems of philosophy with intelligence only and no experience). This short post should have stayed a draft so I am sorry for that.
ArthurLidia
Karma: −65
Show LW: Carl Sagan Documentary
[Question] Ask LW: What happened to Yudkowsky?
Sages in singularity
Human condition sunk fallacy
A rational view on spiritual enlightenment
Akraisa can be over comes. I won’t try to sell you snakeoil by the 5 second rulev was a good book to skim too ->. For explosive phase (jump on chair and do homework.
So homework until 3 pm is the → struggle phase
Life, not a game
Show LW: (video) how to remember everything you learn
Small hope for less bias and more practability
“Giftedness” and Genius, Crucial Differences
Even the by product (ideas) are most trivial too.
Generating ideas shouldn’t be associated with the mammal brain of emotions, have you tried generating any? It quite depends on creative fiction vs researched papers.
I would also like to point out, I don’t mean Buddhism in his whole dogmatic ideas. Almost all people are fine with the side of self control insight etc.
Bayesian enlightnment i guess.