AprilSR

Karma: 949

AprilSR 5 Feb 2025 1:07 UTC
2 points
1
in reply to: Matrice Jacobine’s comment on: Thread for Sense-Making on Recent Murders and How to Sanely Respond
That is such a bizarre claim to make but admittedly including Cosmism at all is really odd

AprilSR 3 Feb 2025 18:24 UTC
3 points
2
in reply to: A_donor’s comment on: Thread for Sense-Making on Recent Murders and How to Sanely Respond
I could imagine something vaguely sorta like this being true but that isn’t like, something I’d confidently predict is a common sort of altered mental state to fall into, having been in altered states somewhere around that cluster.
I’d suspect that like, maybe there’s a component where they intuitively overestimate the dependence relative to other people, but probably it involves deliberate decisions to try to see things a certain way and stuff like that. (Though actually I have no idea what “strength of subjunctive dependence” really means, I think there are unsolved philosophical problems there.)

AprilSR 2 Feb 2025 0:42 UTC
5 points
1
in reply to: lc’s comment on: Thread for Sense-Making on Recent Murders and How to Sanely Respond
Yeah, I haven’t heard of this person, though it’s possible someone I know knows them—that definitely sounds like the kind of person someone should be trying to check in on to me.
I think there are a lot of people out there who will be willing to tell the Ziz sympathetic side of the story. (I mean, I would if asked, though “X did little wrong” seems pretty insane for most people involved and especially for Ziz). Like, I think there’s a certain sort of left anarchismish person who is just, going to be very inclined to take the broke crazy trans women’s side as much as it’s possible to do so. It doesn’t seem possible or even necessarily desirable to track every person with a take like that… whereas with people very very into Zizianism, it seems like important information.
I don’t know exactly what update should be drawn from the fact that people I know were collectively 3 for 3 on having known the people who showed up in recent incidents, information on the topic hasn’t generally been shared freely enough for me to have a whole picture.
Edit: To be thorough about the “everyone I can think of” part, there is this tweet I saw, and you could argue @Slimepriestess hasn’t technically been mentioned in articles or alerts. I don’t really believe either of these people to be dangerous (more confident on Slimepriestess I don’t know much about that Twitter user) but they have explicitly described themselves as Zizian even after recent events, so.
I’ll also explicitly specify that I’m not really inclined to like, list every person I know who is half-fluent in hemisphere nonsense or who has read Sinceriously, there are rather a lot of people who’ve done those things. It’s stuff like, under what situations does this person endorse violence, do they do ideological purity tests for who they’ll be friends with, do they explicitly call themselves a Zizian, and especially whether they’ve started being more reclusive lately.

AprilSR 1 Feb 2025 14:12 UTC
15 points
−6
on: Thread for Sense-Making on Recent Murders and How to Sanely Respond
I think it is worth knowing that—I haven’t heard of any examples of people who have been radicalizing in a Zizianish direction, lately, who are unaccounted for. I and people I know thought about it when we heard about the border patrol shootout, and the only person we came up with was Audere / Maximilian Snyder, who is now under arrest for the murder of Curtis Lind.
Seeing the one person you and your partner have been kind of worried about for a while… end up being the one who did a murder… it’s, well, a hell of an observation to have to update on. Apparently a ball was dropped.
I haven’t made a particular point of going around thoroughly asking everyone who might plausibly know someone, but—all three of the people who recently got in conflicts were known by someone or another I’ve spoken with, to at least plausibly be at risk. So I think there’s some chance that we mostly do collectively have eyes on the “new people becoming Zizian” part.
Of course, maybe it becoming a national news story entirely changes the dynamics there, I don’t know what the situation will look like in a year. But—despite there having been three new people here that haven’t been discussed in any previous community alerts on Zizians, which maybe most people around hadn’t heard of at all, I don’t currently worry much that there’s some substantial number of unknown Zizians out there or something.

AprilSR 26 Jan 2025 22:00 UTC
26 points
8
in reply to: eukaryote’s comment on: [Link] A community alert about Ziz
I am, and am friends with, many trans rationalists, and a bunch of them are lovely people, and also yes in fact the rationalist trans community does sorta tend to be fewer steps removed from the terribleness than other parts of the rationalist community.
I do not think this calls for judging people based on that one fact, it’d be kind of incredibly terrible overall if everyone who happened to know someone who did a terrible thing was shunned over it, and Ic seems to be making a relatively uncharitable read of Jessica Taylor there or something, but I can’t actually say the heuristic is totally useless; if I had stayed far away from trans rats, I wouldn’t have met my girlfriend and also I would be far further removed from the Ziz issues.

AprilSR 26 Jan 2025 3:23 UTC
9 points
6
in reply to: DanielFilan’s comment on: [Link] A community alert about Ziz
Teresa Youngblut, the other person with Ophelia at the shootout, is also known to be a Ziz fan (and in November filed a marriage application to @Audere, also a Ziz fan.) You can see most of this if you look through Jessica’s Twitter.

AprilSR 2 Jan 2025 4:58 UTC
3 points
6
on: Read The Sequences As If They Were Written Today
Oh this sounds fun

AprilSR 1 Jan 2025 21:11 UTC
1 point
0
in reply to: lucid_levi_ackerman’s comment on: So you want to be a witch
I have not heard of any of these people yet

AprilSR 31 Dec 2024 23:35 UTC
3 points
1
on: So you want to be a witch
oh come on, you can’t just be the kind of person who talks about the thing where sometimes people end up seeing way too many synchronicities, explicitly tell me to treat everything as an ARG clue and that if it seems referential it probably is, link a bunch of youtube videos about the time i helped write a statistics paper accusing someone of cheating at minecraft, and look directly at the readers while mention guessing a birthday when your ao3 account was registered on my birthday?

i am well aware by this point that if you look hard enough you’re always bound to find something that seems slightly weird but jeez

AprilSR 9 Dec 2024 9:32 UTC
10 points
2
in reply to: dawnlightmelody’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
I don’t necessarily agree with every line in this post—I’d say I’m better off and still personally kinda like Olivia, though it’s of course been rocky at times—but it does all basically look accurate to me. She stayed at my apartment for maybe a total of 1-2 months earlier this year, and I’ve talked to her a lot. I don’t think she presented the JD Pressman thing as about “lying” to me, but she did generally mention him convincing people to keep her out of things.

There is a lot more I could say, and I am as always happy to answer dms and such, but I am somewhat tired of all this and I don’t right at this moment really want to either figure out exactly what things I feel are necessary to disclose about a friend of mine or try to figure out what would be a helpful contribution to years old drama, given that it’s 1:30am. But I do want to say that I basically think Melody’s statements are all more-or-less reasonable.

AprilSR 9 Dec 2024 5:04 UTC
1 point
0
in reply to: ToasterLightning’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
Yeah, I don’t think it’s correct to call it baseless per se, and I continue to have a lot of questions about the history of the rationality community which haven’t really been addressed publicly, but I would very much not say that there’s good reason to like, directly blame Michael for anything recent!

AprilSR 9 Dec 2024 4:19 UTC
2 points
0
in reply to: ChristianKl’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
I’d already been incredibly paranoid about how closely they follow my online activities for years and years. I dunno if that counts as “conspiratorial”, but to the extent it does it definitely made me less conspiratorial.

I think when I was at my most psychotic some completely deranged explanations for the “rationalists tend to be first borns” thing crossed my mind, which I guess maybe counts, but that was quickly rejected.

I have conspiratorial interpretations of things at times, which I sorta attribute to the fact that rationalists talk about conspiracies quite a lot and such?

AprilSR 8 Dec 2024 3:52 UTC
4 points
0
in reply to: Ben Pace’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
Nope. I’ve never directly interacted with Vassar at all, and I haven’t made any particular decisions at all due to his ideas. Like, I’ve become more familiar with his work as of the past several months, but it was one thing of many.

I spent a lot of time thinking about ontology and anthropics and religion and stuff… mostly I think the reason weird stuff happened to me at the same time as I learned more about Vassar is just that I started rethinking rather a lot of things at the same time, where “are Vassar’s ideas worth considering?” was just one specific question that came up of many. (Plausibly the expectation that Vassar’s ideas might be dangerous turned slightly into a self-fulfilling prophecy by making it more likely for me to expand on them in weirder directions or something.)

AprilSR 8 Dec 2024 2:11 UTC
3 points
0
in reply to: niplav’s comment on: Hazard’s Shortform Feed
I want to say I have to an extent (for all three), though I guess there’s been second-hand in person interactions which maybe counts. I dunno if there’s any sort of central thesis I could summarize, but if you pointed me at like any more specific topics I could take a shot at translating. (Though I’d maybe prefer to avoid the topic for a little while.)

In general, I think an actual analysis of the ideas involved and their merits / drawbacks existing would’ve been a lot more helpful for me than just… people having a spooky reputation was.

AprilSR 7 Dec 2024 23:50 UTC
1 point
0
in reply to: Hazard’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
...Yeah I’m well aware but probably useful context

AprilSR 7 Dec 2024 20:17 UTC
1 point
1
in reply to: tailcalled’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
It was historically a direct relationship, but afaik hasn’t been very close in years.

Edit: Also, if the “Vassarites” are the type of group with “official stances”, this is the first I’ve heard of it.

AprilSR 7 Dec 2024 20:11 UTC
14 points
0
in reply to: ChristianKl’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
Not on LSD, I’ve done some emotional processing with others on MDMA but I don’t know if I’d describe it as “targeted work to change beliefs”, it was more stuff like “talk about my relationship with my family more openly than I’m usually able to.”

I was introduced to belief reporting, but I didn’t do very much of it and wasn’t on drugs at the time.

AprilSR 7 Dec 2024 20:07 UTC
5 points
1
in reply to: sapphire’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
I agree I am “more schizophrenic”, that’s obvious. (Edit: Though I’d argue I’m less paranoid, and beforehand was somewhat in denial about how much paranoia I did have.) I very clearly do not fit the diagnosis criteria. Even if you set aside the six months requirement, the only symptom I even arguably have is delusions and you need multiple.

AprilSR 7 Dec 2024 19:56 UTC
1 point
0
in reply to: sapphire’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
Yeah, I’m not meaning to actively suggest taking psychedelics with any of them.

AprilSR 7 Dec 2024 9:59 UTC
2 points
0
in reply to: Mateusz Bagiński’s comment on: deluks917′s Shortform
Some discussion of coverups can be found at https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/pQGFeKvjydztpgnsY/occupational-infohazards.