Gödelian Logic refers to logic, math, and arguments in the style of Kurt Gödel. Specifically—his two incompleteness theorems, and one completeness theorem. Due to their tricky and subtle nature, his incompleteness theorems are possibly the most misunderstood theorems of all time.
“All the limitative theorems of metamathematics and the theory of computation suggest that once the ability to represent your own structure has reached a certain critical point, that is the kiss of death: it guarantees that you can never represent yourself totally. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem, Church’s Undecidability Theorem, Turing’s Halting Theorem, Tarski’s Truth Theorem — all have the flavour of some ancient fairy tale which warns you that “To seek self-knowledge is to embark on a journey which … will always be incomplete, cannot be charted on any map, will never halt, cannot be described.”—Douglas Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach
Gödel’s Completeness Theorem
This theorem is less well known than the other two, which came after it, but also less misunderstood.
Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem
Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem
Probabilistic Solutions
One way you might think to get around Gödel’s Incompleteness, is to leave behind logical certainty, and instead assign probabilities to logical statements.
External Resources:
Quanta Magazine: How Gödel’s Proof Works
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
Kurt Gödel (including his completeness theorem)
Wikipedia:
I made this tag because there are a lot of posts dealing with Godelian Logic and I think it’s a good subject for a page. I tried to write some content for it, but quickly hit my own lack of understanding about the subject, so the page is in a very unfinished state. I hope someone who who knows the subject better would take the page a fill it in.