RSS

Tribalism

TagLast edit: Feb 8, 2025, 12:32 AM by lesswrong-internal

Tribalism or Coalitional Instincts is closely connected to the concept of in/​out-groups. Coalitional instincts drive humans to act in ways which cause them join, support, defend, and maintain their membership in various coalitions that are defined by sharing a common identity. An illustrative example can be found in A Fable of Science and Politics.

See also: Blues and Greens, Groupthink, Motivated Reasoning, Social and Cultural Dynamics, Social Reality.

The primary function that drove the evolution of coalitions is the amplification of the power of its members in conflicts with non-members. This function explains a number of otherwise puzzling phenomena. For example, ancestrally, if you had no coalition you were nakedly at the mercy of everyone else, so the instinct to belong to a coalition has urgency, preexisting and superseding any policy-driven basis for membership. This is why group beliefs are free to be so weird. [...]
… to earn membership in a group you must send signals that clearly indicate that you differentially support it, compared to rival groups. Hence, optimal weighting of beliefs and communications in the individual mind will make it feel good to think and express content conforming to and flattering to one’s group’s shared beliefs and to attack and misrepresent rival groups. The more biased away from neutral truth, the better the communication functions to affirm coalitional identity, generating polarization in excess of actual policy disagreements. Communications of practical and functional truths are generally useless as differential signals, because any honest person might say them regardless of coalitional loyalty. In contrast, unusual, exaggerated beliefs [...] are unlikely to be said except as expressive of identity, because there is no external reality to motivate nonmembers to speak absurdities.
-- John Tooby, “Coalitional Instincts

Humans interact in dense social networks, and this poses a problem for bystanders when conflicts arise: which side, if any, to support. Choosing sides is a difficult strategic problem because the outcome of a conflict critically depends on which side other bystanders support. One strategy is siding with the higher status disputant, which can allow bystanders to coordinate with one another to take the same side, reducing fighting costs. However, this strategy carries the cost of empowering high-status individuals to exploit others. A second possible strategy is choosing sides based on preexisting relationships. This strategy balances power but carries another cost: Bystanders choose different sides, and this discoordination causes escalated conflicts and high fighting costs. We propose that moral cognition is designed to manage both of these problems by implementing a dynamic coordination strategy in which bystanders coordinate side-taking based on a public signal derived from disputants’ actions rather than their identities. By focusing on disputants’ actions, bystanders can dynamically change which individuals they support across different disputes, simultaneously solving the problems of coordination and exploitation.
-- Peter DeScioli & Robert Kurzban, ” A Solution to the Mysteries of Morality

Poli­tics is the Mind-Killer

Eliezer YudkowskyFeb 18, 2007, 9:23 PM
296 points
243 comments2 min readLW link

Ap­plause Lights

Eliezer YudkowskySep 11, 2007, 6:31 PM
371 points
99 comments2 min readLW link

I Can Tol­er­ate Any­thing Ex­cept The Outgroup

Scott AlexanderSep 2, 2017, 8:22 AM
101 points
4 comments28 min readLW link

Pro­fess­ing and Cheering

Eliezer YudkowskyAug 2, 2007, 7:20 AM
119 points
45 comments2 min readLW link

Eth­nic Ten­sion And Mean­ingless Arguments

Scott AlexanderNov 5, 2014, 3:38 AM
92 points
8 comments22 min readLW link

Belief as Attire

Eliezer YudkowskyAug 2, 2007, 5:13 PM
137 points
105 comments2 min readLW link

A Fable of Science and Politics

Eliezer YudkowskyDec 23, 2006, 4:50 AM
350 points
100 comments5 min readLW link

Can group iden­tity be a force for good?

Eric NeymanJul 4, 2021, 5:16 PM
22 points
13 comments6 min readLW link
(ericneyman.wordpress.com)

Rats, Back a Candidate

BlakeJul 28, 2024, 3:19 AM
−40 points
19 comments1 min readLW link

Have no heroes, and no villains

PhilGoetzNov 7, 2010, 9:15 PM
130 points
73 comments1 min readLW link

Dun­bar’s Function

Eliezer YudkowskyDec 31, 2008, 2:26 AM
68 points
65 comments6 min readLW link

28 so­cial psy­chol­ogy stud­ies from *Ex­per­i­ments With Peo­ple* (Frey & Gregg, 2017)

Yuxi_LiuJun 16, 2019, 2:23 AM
12 points
1 comment26 min readLW link

Anti-trib­al­ism and pos­i­tive men­tal health as high-value cause areas

Kaj_SotalaAug 2, 2018, 8:30 AM
26 points
6 comments2 min readLW link
(kajsotala.fi)

Fight the Power

Jacob FalkovichJun 22, 2020, 2:19 AM
23 points
3 comments7 min readLW link

Every Cause Wants To Be A Cult

Eliezer YudkowskyDec 12, 2007, 3:04 AM
125 points
41 comments3 min readLW link

False Laughter

Eliezer YudkowskyDec 22, 2007, 6:03 AM
43 points
65 comments3 min readLW link

Plan to Be Lucky

Jacob FalkovichJan 16, 2018, 1:00 AM
11 points
3 comments1 min readLW link
(putanumonit.com)

Sup­port­ing the un­der­dog is ex­plained by Han­son’s Near/​Far distinction

RokoApr 5, 2009, 8:22 PM
31 points
27 comments4 min readLW link

[Book Re­view] Destiny Disrupted

lsusrMar 21, 2021, 7:09 AM
58 points
4 comments9 min readLW link

Tran­si­tive Tol­er­ance Means Intolerance

orthonormalAug 14, 2021, 5:52 PM
39 points
13 comments2 min readLW link

Sum­mary of a new study on out-group hate (and how to fix it)

DirectedEvolutionDec 4, 2022, 1:53 AM
60 points
30 comments3 min readLW link
(www.pnas.org)

A gen­eral com­ment on dis­cus­sions of ge­netic group differences

anonymous8101Jan 14, 2023, 2:11 AM
70 points
46 comments3 min readLW link

Be­neath My Epistemic Dignity

David UdellFeb 28, 2023, 4:02 AM
6 points
3 comments2 min readLW link

Notes on Loyalty

David GrossNov 15, 2020, 7:30 PM
17 points
2 comments8 min readLW link

The bias shield

PhilGoetzDec 31, 2011, 5:44 PM
29 points
65 comments6 min readLW link

Only You Can Prevent Your Mind From Get­ting Killed By Politics

ChrisHallquistOct 26, 2013, 1:59 PM
61 points
144 comments5 min readLW link

Why ar­tifi­cial op­ti­mism?

jessicataJul 15, 2019, 9:41 PM
67 points
29 comments4 min readLW link
(unstableontology.com)

Do you fear the rock or the hard place?

RubyJul 20, 2019, 10:01 PM
77 points
10 comments5 min readLW link3 reviews

Memetic Tribalism

[deleted]Feb 14, 2013, 3:03 AM
62 points
62 comments4 min readLW link

Mini thoughts on mintheism

CraigMichaelJan 11, 2021, 5:14 AM
14 points
3 comments7 min readLW link

Democ­racy Is in Danger, but Not for the Rea­sons You Think

ExCephNov 6, 2022, 9:15 PM
−7 points
4 comments12 min readLW link
(ginnungagapfoundation.wordpress.com)

Anti-trib­al­ism and pos­i­tive men­tal health as high-value cause areas

Kaj_SotalaOct 17, 2017, 10:20 AM
12 points
14 comments2 min readLW link
(kajsotala.fi)

Sta­tus for sta­tus sake is a fact of poli­ti­cal life

Tim LiptrotAug 18, 2020, 10:06 PM
10 points
11 comments1 min readLW link

In Defense of Epistemic Em­pa­thy

Kevin DorstDec 27, 2023, 4:27 PM
60 points
19 comments6 min readLW link
(kevindorst.substack.com)

Jour­nal ar­ti­cle about poli­tics and mindkilling

CronoDASSep 7, 2011, 7:46 AM
41 points
2 comments1 min readLW link

Man­u­fac­tur­ing prejudice

PhilGoetzApr 3, 2011, 5:26 PM
37 points
73 comments1 min readLW link

Fac­tions, in­equal­ity, and so­cial justice

John_MaxwellDec 3, 2012, 7:37 PM
44 points
173 comments6 min readLW link

Does Evolu­tion­ary The­ory Im­ply Ge­netic Trib­al­ism?

Zero ContradictionsAug 6, 2024, 5:43 AM
0 points
1 comment1 min readLW link
(thewaywardaxolotl.blogspot.com)

Tak­ing the Out­group Seriously

Davis_KingsleyFeb 16, 2020, 1:23 PM
21 points
8 comments2 min readLW link

The Village and the River Mon­sters… Or: Less Fight­ing, More Brainstorming

ExCephOct 3, 2022, 11:01 PM
7 points
29 comments8 min readLW link
(ginnungagapfoundation.wordpress.com)

The Think­ing Lad­der—Wait But Why

LironSep 29, 2019, 6:51 PM
19 points
1 comment1 min readLW link
(waitbutwhy.com)

[Question] Why do fu­tur­ists care about the cul­ture war?

Knight LeeJan 14, 2025, 7:35 AM
22 points
22 comments2 min readLW link

Po­lariza­tion is Not (Stan­dard) Bayesian

Kevin DorstSep 16, 2023, 4:31 PM
11 points
6 comments7 min readLW link
(kevindorst.substack.com)

Im­prov­ing lo­cal gov­er­nance in frag­ile states—prac­ti­cal les­sons from the field

Tim LiptrotJul 29, 2020, 1:54 AM
16 points
3 comments6 min readLW link

The Sword of Good

Eliezer YudkowskySep 3, 2009, 12:53 AM
156 points
303 comments2 min readLW link

How to Not Lose an Argument

Scott AlexanderMar 19, 2009, 1:07 AM
164 points
416 comments6 min readLW link

That Thing That Happened

[deleted]Dec 18, 2012, 12:29 PM
33 points
85 comments2 min readLW link

Ci­vil­ity Is Never Neutral

ozymandiasNov 22, 2017, 4:54 PM
57 points
15 comments4 min readLW link

Science as Attire

Eliezer YudkowskyAug 23, 2007, 5:10 AM
166 points
88 comments2 min readLW link

Of Ex­clu­sion­ary Speech and Gen­der Politics

Eliezer YudkowskyJul 21, 2009, 7:22 AM
90 points
669 comments5 min readLW link

Wron­gol­ogy 101

sarahconstantinApr 25, 2018, 12:00 AM
32 points
5 comments7 min readLW link
(srconstantin.wordpress.com)

Miss­ing the Trees for the Forest

Scott AlexanderJul 22, 2009, 3:23 AM
87 points
159 comments7 min readLW link

Stop Vot­ing For Nincompoops

Eliezer YudkowskyJan 2, 2008, 6:00 PM
76 points
92 comments8 min readLW link

Poli­tics is hard mode

Rob BensingerJul 21, 2014, 10:14 PM
59 points
109 comments6 min readLW link
No comments.