Fair point. I suppose it was that if everyone posted subtle variations on a theme it’s a way to vote mine. Or simply copy someone else’s answer, write in an “Edit: ninja’d” and hope for accidental votes.
Having said that, looking at the HTML is a much more general solution and probably does deserve an up-vote. But the principle was to only give a vote to the first person to answer, because after that help is technically unsolicited (since they can see it’s already been given).
Just curious, what’s wrong with someone who gave advice that 1. was asked for and 2. the asker found useful, getting upvotes?
Fair point. I suppose it was that if everyone posted subtle variations on a theme it’s a way to vote mine. Or simply copy someone else’s answer, write in an “Edit: ninja’d” and hope for accidental votes.
Having said that, looking at the HTML is a much more general solution and probably does deserve an up-vote. But the principle was to only give a vote to the first person to answer, because after that help is technically unsolicited (since they can see it’s already been given).