I think this post would be easier to understand if you called the model what OpenAI is calling it: “o1”, not “GPT-4o1″.
Yep, I’ve fixed it throughout.
That’s how bad the name is, my lord—you have a GPT-4o and then an o1, and there is no relation between the two ’o’s.
It’s “o1” or “OpenAI o1,” not “GPT-o1.”
I think this post would be easier to understand if you called the model what OpenAI is calling it: “o1”, not “GPT-4o1″.
Yep, I’ve fixed it throughout.
That’s how bad the name is, my lord—you have a GPT-4o and then an o1, and there is no relation between the two ’o’s.
It’s “o1” or “OpenAI o1,” not “GPT-o1.”