Maybe. I just thought that LessWrong doesn’t just turn into a standard site with “ten tips on how to improve your life”, on the other hand, explicitly posing the question gives at least two answers: send about ready-made to other sites, and here give non-standard / new tips, talk about things that no one has noticed yet.
just turn into a standard site with “ten tips on how to improve your life”,
The obvious upgrade is having ‘life improvement’ be more experimental. People try things out and see how well they work, etc. (I’m not saying there has to be ‘peer review’ but ‘peer experimentation’ does seem like a good idea.)
Another approach is grouping things together, and having tools so that those things can be filtered out. (This won’t be perfect because short form ‘posts’ don’t have tags.) Also issues around content sticking around, versus floating down the river of time.
Maybe. I just thought that LessWrong doesn’t just turn into a standard site with “ten tips on how to improve your life”, on the other hand, explicitly posing the question gives at least two answers: send about ready-made to other sites, and here give non-standard / new tips, talk about things that no one has noticed yet.
The obvious upgrade is having ‘life improvement’ be more experimental. People try things out and see how well they work, etc. (I’m not saying there has to be ‘peer review’ but ‘peer experimentation’ does seem like a good idea.)
Another approach is grouping things together, and having tools so that those things can be filtered out. (This won’t be perfect because short form ‘posts’ don’t have tags.) Also issues around content sticking around, versus floating down the river of time.