Presumably they agreed with Scott’s criticisms of it, and thought they were severe enough problems to make it not Review-worthy?
I didn’t get around to (?re-)reading & voting on it, but I might’ve wound up downvoting if I did. It does hit a pet peeve of mine, where people act as if ‘bad discourse is okay if it’s from a critic’.
Presumably they agreed with Scott’s criticisms of it, and thought they were severe enough problems to make it not Review-worthy?
I didn’t get around to (?re-)reading & voting on it, but I might’ve wound up downvoting if I did. It does hit a pet peeve of mine, where people act as if ‘bad discourse is okay if it’s from a critic’.