Six Feet Is An Arbitrary Number. There’s still nothing better than an inverse square law, so by default I presume 12 feet is a quarter of the risk of 6 feet, and 3 feet is double the risk, there is no magic number.
Should this say that 3 feet is quadruple the risk of 6 feet, if we’re assuming an inverse square law?
Should this say that 3 feet is quadruple the risk of 6 feet, if we’re assuming an inverse square law?
Fixed, thanks. Moving too fast, whoops, etc.