Now I have a better understanding and now I can formulate that it does not take into account the possibility that the report of four victories may be false, that the lotteries could be dishonest, that the woman could simply hack the mechanism of pseudo-randomness, and also does not take into account a priori information in the form of that there are 8 billion people on Earth, and there have been many lotteries throughout history, so the probability that at least someone wins 4 lotteries is very different from the probability of winning a particular woman, in addition, even though she won in a row, and not for a lifetime, you should also take into account the total number of attempts to play the lottery, because the probability of 4 wins in a row is very different if you played 4 times or 400 times, finally, in general, the a priori probability of violating the laws of physics or mathematics, in general, any supernatural strength is extremely low, since these models have a huge amount of evidence for and new evidence will need to overcome all their mass, so the choice will very slowly reach the hypothesis of violation in the laws of the lower level, even if we cannot find an explanation for this event, and finally even if we decide that there is something supernatural here, then there are a lot of options here, it is far from necessarily God, and even more so not necessarily Christian, each of these two hypotheses will have to be proved separately from the presence of supernatural.
Now I have a better understanding and now I can formulate that it does not take into account the possibility that the report of four victories may be false, that the lotteries could be dishonest, that the woman could simply hack the mechanism of pseudo-randomness, and also does not take into account a priori information in the form of that there are 8 billion people on Earth, and there have been many lotteries throughout history, so the probability that at least someone wins 4 lotteries is very different from the probability of winning a particular woman, in addition, even though she won in a row, and not for a lifetime, you should also take into account the total number of attempts to play the lottery, because the probability of 4 wins in a row is very different if you played 4 times or 400 times, finally, in general, the a priori probability of violating the laws of physics or mathematics, in general, any supernatural strength is extremely low, since these models have a huge amount of evidence for and new evidence will need to overcome all their mass, so the choice will very slowly reach the hypothesis of violation in the laws of the lower level, even if we cannot find an explanation for this event, and finally even if we decide that there is something supernatural here, then there are a lot of options here, it is far from necessarily God, and even more so not necessarily Christian, each of these two hypotheses will have to be proved separately from the presence of supernatural.