Right, sorry. I had only read the news article at the time of making this post, which doesn’t say any of the above. Edited to reflect this.
It is extremely overconfident to take a paper you haven’t read and declare it overturns decades of scientific consensus.
Yes, it was. I was distracted by pretty words like NASA and peer reviewed, and assumed the author of the news article would faithfully report what the paper said. Stupid of me (no sarcasm).
Right, sorry. I had only read the news article at the time of making this post, which doesn’t say any of the above. Edited to reflect this.
It is extremely overconfident to take a paper you haven’t read and declare it overturns decades of scientific consensus.
Yes, it was. I was distracted by pretty words like NASA and peer reviewed, and assumed the author of the news article would faithfully report what the paper said. Stupid of me (no sarcasm).