I would guess there’s a group of people who are just more likely to buy newer, less tested things. These people bought into Zune, but they also got a facebook before nobody else did. AKA, early adaptors.
falenas108
Karma: 2,403
Norfolk Social—VA Rationalists
Norfolk Social—VA Rationalists—EA 101
Norfolk Social—VA Rationalists
If lack of social skills were the only part of autism this might be onto something. But autism tends to be a cluster of symptoms, which aren’t explainable by a lack of social interactions. For example, autistic people tend to have different sensory perception. I would not expect that symptom to appear from early isolation.
That’s not necessarily the case. Low hanging fruit seems like a plausible alternative, as well as the success of meet-up groups or other real-life rationality things replacing online interactions.
I’m about to start being paid for a job, and I was looking at investment advice from LW. I found this thread from a while back and it seemed good, but it’s also 4 years old. Can anyone confirm if the first bullet is still accurate? (get VTSMX or VFINX on vanguard, it doesn’t matter too much which one.)
I’m about to graduate college and go into the real world, and I’m trying to get a job right now. If I’m not able to get one in the next few months, I will need some source of income. What are good reliable ways that I can convert time to money before I get a full-time job?
EDIT: I’m a physics/chemistry undergraduate with a decent GPA, and I have some skills in coding if that helps. I’m applying for jobs in software development and data analysis, and I’ve applied to 25 so far and have only heard back from 1. I’m going to keep applying and am fairly confident I’ll get something, but in case everything fails I want to have a backup.
The biggest thing I did was a showcase item with the MONIAC cycle mentioned earlier. Me and one other person were representing the mercury cycle in nature. We had different plastic bottles representing different parts of nature/forms of mercury, like the atmosphere, methylated and unmethylated mercury, in crustaceans, plankton, fish, ect. The things died or get put in the seafloor, and got pumped back to the top by volcanoes and human activity. (We should have had more stay in the seafloor, but our pump was too powerful.) The flow successfully showed that the top of the food chain got the most mercury, and if the top level “dies” from too much mercury (flows to that bottle were cut off), the next in the chain started to accumulate more mercury.
Other than that, I:
*Wrote 2 Miss American Doll style intro books for KatelynUnit 742-B in the year 2500, KatelynUnit Saves the Never-Ending Day (Because we don’t have night anymore) and STANDARD GREETINGS.
*Made a cod-shaped codpiece
*Made a mashup of 4 Taylor Swift songs of 1989 and gregorian chants (989)
*Made a budget for the Minor Activities Board (parody of the Major Activities Board)
*Made an ad for the main technician in the experimental physics class, Van Bistrow, for his now restaurant, The Van Bistro.
As one of two captains I also did general organizing and made sure other people had what they needed to do their items.
In general I don’t think there are foundational ideas on LW that shouldn’t be questioned. Any idea is up for investigation provided the case is well argued.
But there are certain ideas that will be downvoted and dismissed because people feel like they aren’t useful to be talking about, like if God exists. I think OP was asking if it was a topic that fell under this category.
You can probably think about it as the lines of a gravity field also going through the wormhole, and I believe the gravitational force would be 0 around the wormhole.
The actual answer involves thinking about gravity and spacetime as a geometry, which I don’t think you want to answer your question.
Yeah, when I was reading this article I kept thinking that social cues are generally not as ambiguous as this article is making it seem.
Off the top of my head, I can’t remember a time when me and another person interpreted multiple social cues from a variety of people in completely the opposite directions. Plenty of times when we focused on different traits, but not where one person interpreted someone as warm and open and someone else as cold and unwelcoming.
This may not make much sense to people outside University of Chicago, but every year we have a huge scavenger hunt, one of the biggest in the world, where we do things like make a keyboards that can perform logical operations, made a MONIAC cycles of natural systems, and has in the past included one team making a working nuclear reactor.
Me and one other person decided to form a team for this year, and we co-captained this team. We did way better than anyone expected, beating every team that wasn’t an established house team that had over 100 people and lots of monetary resources, while our team had only 15 people.
I think there are two important points I got from the typical mind fallacy. The first is the usually one, that people have different preferences and different ways of thinking. The second is that people have different experiences, and I shouldn’t use my experiences with a certain subject as a model for everyone’s. Perhaps this could be called the typical experience fallacy?
For example, I grew up in a reform Jew, and my experience from that was “Unpleasant to be forced to say things I don’t agree with, but tolerant of differences.” It wasn’t until I talked with others about their experiences that I realized it ranged to anything from “Everyone must believe strictly in everything, any disagreements are signs of evil” of Orthodox to “God probably doesn’t exist and we should do our best to help others” of humanistic chapters.
It’s at least plausible that Snape, as a potions expert who grew up with muggles, thought there might be some connection between potions and chemistry and learned the basics of chemistry.
Is this idea for current Western society, or for love overall?
ETHICAL INJUNCTION:
Any moral reasoning that results in ”...and I will be miserable for the rest of my life” that is not extremely difficult to prevent and has few other tradeoffs is probably not correct, no matter how well-argued.
More generally, I think Harry should be doing more towards putting together a team.
Which is a lesson he should have learned when Hermione beat him and Draco in the first battle.
There was one part where they were talking about what would happen if Harry were not raised by scientists, and EY basically describes canon.
Actually, yes.
EDIT: At least, adjusting the cost for how much a USD gets you in South Africa.