Is it bad that I almost instantly find a way to make sense of nearly all of these? For example:
This may sound a bit crazy right now, but hear me out: a/an anthill is an aspiring ontologically basic mental entity.
Sounds like a reference to Hofstadter’s musings on reductive versus holistic descriptions of reality in Godel, Escher, Bach, when he used an anthill as an example.
Is it bad that I almost instantly find a way to make sense of nearly all of these? For example:
Sounds like a reference to Hofstadter’s musings on reductive versus holistic descriptions of reality in Godel, Escher, Bach, when he used an anthill as an example.
That’s actually where I got the idea of adding anthill from.