1. At least add say you’ve being doing something like this in the post for 6 months with awesome succees. A bigger ask would be providing more detail on what you mean by “awesome success” would be helpful. Give us a reason to believe this works.
2.
I see your point and agree. Maybe I was being dramatic. Maybe I should change “loss of friendship” to something like, “unresolved relationship tension”?
[...]
What if I added a part in the conclusion that states this is not the ideal rules for conflict resolution if you are willing to accept the risk of being manipulated. These are only the rules if you want to completely avoid the possibility of being manipulated, and are willing to accept the tradeoffs? Do you think that would square the vibes?
Making the changes to “loss of friendship”, along with adding your reasoning behind the rules in the conclusion would imrpve the post IMO.
3. When I considered tweaking this to be an internal therapy tool, I thought it would be similair to IFS. It is somewhat well known on LW. Kaj Sotala’s mutli-agent models of the mind sequence has a good exposition on the topic. There are probably better expositions, but that’s where I learned of it. There’s also a good discussion on the value of IFS and why rats like it here.
Your comments made it clear when this technique is valuable, so thanks. With some luck, I might try it out.
Thank you. I’m going to work on the edits. Also thank you for the link, I am going to read up on IFS before finals edits to see if I can see this with new eyes.
1. At least add say you’ve being doing something like this in the post for 6 months with awesome succees. A bigger ask would be providing more detail on what you mean by “awesome success” would be helpful. Give us a reason to believe this works.
2.
Making the changes to “loss of friendship”, along with adding your reasoning behind the rules in the conclusion would imrpve the post IMO.
3. When I considered tweaking this to be an internal therapy tool, I thought it would be similair to IFS. It is somewhat well known on LW. Kaj Sotala’s mutli-agent models of the mind sequence has a good exposition on the topic. There are probably better expositions, but that’s where I learned of it. There’s also a good discussion on the value of IFS and why rats like it here.
Your comments made it clear when this technique is valuable, so thanks. With some luck, I might try it out.
Thank you. I’m going to work on the edits. Also thank you for the link, I am going to read up on IFS before finals edits to see if I can see this with new eyes.