Don’t mean to sound harsh and this will certainly sound unfeasible if you’re deep in love or lacking the resources to spark new ones, but a person, man or woman, can get much, much better than a LDR, and I make myself sorry to read about one.
If I was in you place and valued my time at all, and the expected benefit of my time alive, I’d drop the relationship and get a new one.
The One is a myth. In need of love we’ll accept a lot of things we think we now think we can’t, and get over them or even come to love them and think our old preferences were ridiculous. You’ll probably be extremely sad for a while. If you don’t make identity of it and move on with action (ie actually seeing other people, not just telling yourself ‘I Need To Move On’, which has the opposite effect), you’ll be better off.
Yes, 100%. But really good chemistry comes in grades, in this case I feel really really good chemistry. There are probably partners “above the acceptable threshold” nearby, and if I date date long enough I might feel the same about someone else, but in this case LDR is a temporary inconvenience, I just want to make it work in LDR format until I feel good/convinced enough to turn it into N(ear)DR, which is well in my power to do.
Making my upvote known.
I wish you well and hope you’ll be able to figure out what’s real and what’s self deception when it comes to chemistry, as often it’s superficial things like “he/she resists me”, which disappear sooner or later, that drive your impression.
Everyone is different, and I’d avoid hyperbole like “if I valued my time at all”. I know of a number of 15-year or longer marriages that included long distances for part of the courtship, and sometimes parts of the marriage. On the topic of this post (existence proofs for unconventional courtship success), I got ’em for LDRs.
But you should acknowledge that it’s a burden, and both you and your partner will have to work harder to develop and maintain bonds when you’re not near each other most of the time. And you should have a pretty good hope that the distance is temporary—I don’t know of any successful cases where the couple permanently lives apart.
Agreed about the hyperbole although don’t have mental energy left for reasons xyz. The question about LDRs isn’t whether they exist, which they obviously do, but about whether they’re not easily replaceable for a much higher reward situation, ie love in the same location.
I can now see why this comment is problematic; hidden judgements, not just facts and reasons. I’m maintaining it because I lost karma for it and don’t want to de-incriminate myself. I’m planning this comment will make me look good but not expecting karma back although I obviously want it.
Don’t mean to sound harsh and this will certainly sound unfeasible if you’re deep in love or lacking the resources to spark new ones, but a person, man or woman, can get much, much better than a LDR, and I make myself sorry to read about one.
If I was in you place and valued my time at all, and the expected benefit of my time alive, I’d drop the relationship and get a new one.
The One is a myth. In need of love we’ll accept a lot of things we think we now think we can’t, and get over them or even come to love them and think our old preferences were ridiculous. You’ll probably be extremely sad for a while. If you don’t make identity of it and move on with action (ie actually seeing other people, not just telling yourself ‘I Need To Move On’, which has the opposite effect), you’ll be better off.
Yes, 100%. But really good chemistry comes in grades, in this case I feel really really good chemistry. There are probably partners “above the acceptable threshold” nearby, and if I date date long enough I might feel the same about someone else, but in this case LDR is a temporary inconvenience, I just want to make it work in LDR format until I feel good/convinced enough to turn it into N(ear)DR, which is well in my power to do.
Making my upvote known. I wish you well and hope you’ll be able to figure out what’s real and what’s self deception when it comes to chemistry, as often it’s superficial things like “he/she resists me”, which disappear sooner or later, that drive your impression.
Everyone is different, and I’d avoid hyperbole like “if I valued my time at all”. I know of a number of 15-year or longer marriages that included long distances for part of the courtship, and sometimes parts of the marriage. On the topic of this post (existence proofs for unconventional courtship success), I got ’em for LDRs.
But you should acknowledge that it’s a burden, and both you and your partner will have to work harder to develop and maintain bonds when you’re not near each other most of the time. And you should have a pretty good hope that the distance is temporary—I don’t know of any successful cases where the couple permanently lives apart.
Agreed about the hyperbole although don’t have mental energy left for reasons xyz. The question about LDRs isn’t whether they exist, which they obviously do, but about whether they’re not easily replaceable for a much higher reward situation, ie love in the same location.
I can now see why this comment is problematic; hidden judgements, not just facts and reasons. I’m maintaining it because I lost karma for it and don’t want to de-incriminate myself. I’m planning this comment will make me look good but not expecting karma back although I obviously want it.
It’s an LDR that I intend to turn into NDR. LDR temporarily. Hope that helps.
Not retracted (I guess no more delete feature) just expanding longer comment elsewhere