This post is in Main and not Discussion so I can get some clarification on what belongs in Main and what belongs in Discussion, and also because of what looks like a demand for more non-meta posts in Main. I’d be happy to move it to Discussion if people think this is too short or doesn’t have enough citations or something to be in Main.
I would expect some more “meat” from a Main post; for example, some hard empirical data that points to the effectiveness of thinking without internal censors—assuming that anyone had ever studied this issue, of course.
I approve of this post being in Main and I approve of your accommodation to the appearance of that demand and I approve of your testing what might be but I hope are not the boundaries of what people want to see in Main.
This post is in Main and not Discussion so I can get some clarification on what belongs in Main and what belongs in Discussion, and also because of what looks like a demand for more non-meta posts in Main. I’d be happy to move it to Discussion if people think this is too short or doesn’t have enough citations or something to be in Main.
I would expect some more “meat” from a Main post; for example, some hard empirical data that points to the effectiveness of thinking without internal censors—assuming that anyone had ever studied this issue, of course.
Fair. Ordinarily I would’ve given examples, but given the nature of the subject…
Edit: I think this point is more important than I originally thought and have moved the post to Discussion accordingly.
Agreeing that it should have been in Discussion.
I approve of this post being in Main and I approve of your accommodation to the appearance of that demand and I approve of your testing what might be but I hope are not the boundaries of what people want to see in Main.