But you only make decisions after you exist. Of course, your decisions influence whether or not you exist but they don’t happen until after you exist. But once you exist, no matter how you act, there is a zero percent chance that you won’t exist.
I think a huge part of your crux of disagreement is whether it’s posiible to be mistaken about your own existence.
If you can be mistaken, say because instead of existing in the real world you may just be part of a simulation where the predictor is determining your decision and thus, whether to create you in the real world or not, and you value existence in the real world, then your counter argument doesn’t make sense.
However, if you can be certain that you definetely exist in a real world, then indeed, your counterargument works.
I think a huge part of your crux of disagreement is whether it’s posiible to be mistaken about your own existence.
If you can be mistaken, say because instead of existing in the real world you may just be part of a simulation where the predictor is determining your decision and thus, whether to create you in the real world or not, and you value existence in the real world, then your counter argument doesn’t make sense.
However, if you can be certain that you definetely exist in a real world, then indeed, your counterargument works.