If we seek societal acceptance of the solution, then the secretary-general of the UN is probably the best choice.
If we seek the best possible outcome for humanity, then I would vote for Eliezer. It is unlikely that there is a more suitable person to speak with a Bayesian superintelligence on behalf of humanity.
If we want to maximize the scenario’s realism, then some dude from Google/OpenAI is more likely to be the human in question.
Depends on what we are trying to maximize.
If we seek societal acceptance of the solution, then the secretary-general of the UN is probably the best choice.
If we seek the best possible outcome for humanity, then I would vote for Eliezer. It is unlikely that there is a more suitable person to speak with a Bayesian superintelligence on behalf of humanity.
If we want to maximize the scenario’s realism, then some dude from Google/OpenAI is more likely to be the human in question.