If we seek societal acceptance of the solution, then the secretary-general of the UN is probably the best choice.
If we seek the best possible outcome for humanity, then I would vote for Eliezer. It is unlikely that there is a more suitable person to speak with a Bayesian superintelligence on behalf of humanity.
If we want to maximize the scenario’s realism, then some dude from Google/OpenAI is more likely to be the human in question.
Aligned to which human?
Depends on what we are trying to maximize.
If we seek societal acceptance of the solution, then the secretary-general of the UN is probably the best choice.
If we seek the best possible outcome for humanity, then I would vote for Eliezer. It is unlikely that there is a more suitable person to speak with a Bayesian superintelligence on behalf of humanity.
If we want to maximize the scenario’s realism, then some dude from Google/OpenAI is more likely to be the human in question.