I think it genuinely wise, it contains three related important concepts: 1) You should try to make the world a better place, 2) You shouldn’t waste your effort in attempting 1 in situations when you will almost certainly fail, 3) in order to succeed at 1 & 2 you need to be able to understand the world around you, a desire, to affect change isn’t enough.
The only thing that’s missing form it is something about having the insight to distinguish good changes form bad ones.
You shouldn’t waste your effort in attempting 1 in situations when you will almost certainly fail,
Not quite. You want to consider the expected value of the attempt, not the raw probability of success. A 0.1% chance of curing cancer or ‘old age’ is to be preferred over an 80% chance of winning the X-Factor (particularly given that the latter applies to yourself).
It would definitely be foolish to waste effort attempting something that will certainly fail.
I agree with your qualifications, I was oversimplifying. And the reason I didn’t say certainly fail because I try to avoid using the word “certain” unless I’m dealing with purely logical systems.
And the reason I didn’t say certainly fail because I try to avoid using the word “certain” unless I’m dealing with purely logical systems.
A worthy goal. Usually that will prevent you from making claims that are technically wrong despite being inspired by good thinking. This seems to be a rare case where defaulting to not using an absolute introduces the technical problem.
1) You should try to make the world a better place
is actually implied by the original wording. Clippy could also view
God, grant me the serenity To accept the things I cannot change; Courage to change the things I can; And wisdom to know the difference.
as wise, though in vis case, “the things I cannot change” would be closer to “the resources I am unable to apply to paperclips”. One can’t expect too much specificity from a 25 word quote… I’m taking your point
The only thing that’s missing form it is something about having the insight to distinguish good changes form bad ones.
(which I agree with) as meaning that one should have the insight to distinguish instrumental subgoals that actually will advance one’s ultimate goals from subgoals that don’t accomplish this. (This is separate from differences in ultimate goals.)
I think it genuinely wise, it contains three related important concepts: 1) You should try to make the world a better place, 2) You shouldn’t waste your effort in attempting 1 in situations when you will almost certainly fail, 3) in order to succeed at 1 & 2 you need to be able to understand the world around you, a desire, to affect change isn’t enough.
The only thing that’s missing form it is something about having the insight to distinguish good changes form bad ones.
Not quite. You want to consider the expected value of the attempt, not the raw probability of success. A 0.1% chance of curing cancer or ‘old age’ is to be preferred over an 80% chance of winning the X-Factor (particularly given that the latter applies to yourself).
It would definitely be foolish to waste effort attempting something that will certainly fail.
I agree with your qualifications, I was oversimplifying. And the reason I didn’t say certainly fail because I try to avoid using the word “certain” unless I’m dealing with purely logical systems.
A worthy goal. Usually that will prevent you from making claims that are technically wrong despite being inspired by good thinking. This seems to be a rare case where defaulting to not using an absolute introduces the technical problem.
Just an indication that one should avoid absolutes: even an absolute directive to avoid absolutes ;)
I don’t think that
is actually implied by the original wording. Clippy could also view
as wise, though in vis case, “the things I cannot change” would be closer to “the resources I am unable to apply to paperclips”. One can’t expect too much specificity from a 25 word quote… I’m taking your point
(which I agree with) as meaning that one should have the insight to distinguish instrumental subgoals that actually will advance one’s ultimate goals from subgoals that don’t accomplish this. (This is separate from differences in ultimate goals.)
That all sounds right to me.