One thing I want to talk about is that restricting human agency is plausibly fine, and maybe even net-good, and that this is important for future AI governments.
One reason can be for example making the physical world making it more like the online world, thus making more dictatorial forms of government and policing necessary to prevent constant chaos.
One thing I want to talk about is that restricting human agency is plausibly fine, and maybe even net-good, and that this is important for future AI governments.
One reason can be for example making the physical world making it more like the online world, thus making more dictatorial forms of government and policing necessary to prevent constant chaos.
Is restricting human agency fine if humans have little control over where it is restricted and to what degree?
Sometimes, the answer is actually yes.