The obvious answer is “drug laws and mandatory sentences”, and the article does propose to do away with them.
Moving towards drug legalistation works a lot better since it’s proponents focus on what’s politically possible with medical marijuana legislation then focusing on the maximum position of abolishing all prisons.
Often advocates have a hard time with being pragmatic. The original quote is saying you shouldn’t be too pragmatic, but the opposite lesson is true as well.
Often advocates have a hard time with being pragmatic.
I think, translated into a normal language, this means “Have no clue what they are talking about”. An alternative translation is “Should not be allowed withing six feet of sharp objects”.
Moving towards drug legalistation works a lot better since it’s proponents focus on what’s politically possible with medical marijuana legislation then focusing on the maximum position of abolishing all prisons.
Often advocates have a hard time with being pragmatic. The original quote is saying you shouldn’t be too pragmatic, but the opposite lesson is true as well.
I think, translated into a normal language, this means “Have no clue what they are talking about”. An alternative translation is “Should not be allowed withing six feet of sharp objects”.