Yeahhhh, as I expected DALL-E cannot super follow the negation here. (We also tried to ask it for “a stop sign, spelled incorrectly” and it just gave us stop signs.)
Perhaps there is no operation of negation on cats in it’s model. I’d predict it’d have an easier time just taking things out of pictures, so the prompt “a picture of my bed with no sheets” should produce a bed with no sheets. Perhaps if you wrote “This picture has no cats in it. The title is ‘the opposite of a cat’”, then I am uncertain about the output.
Yeahhhh, as I expected DALL-E cannot super follow the negation here. (We also tried to ask it for “a stop sign, spelled incorrectly” and it just gave us stop signs.)
Hmm, theoretically, DALL-E might be assuming the prompt is irony. What about this: “Apparently, this is a cat???”
Yeah, no, it just gives me...cats.
Perhaps there is no operation of negation on cats in it’s model. I’d predict it’d have an easier time just taking things out of pictures, so the prompt “a picture of my bed with no sheets” should produce a bed with no sheets. Perhaps if you wrote “This picture has no cats in it. The title is ‘the opposite of a cat’”, then I am uncertain about the output.