If there was a being that had by far the highest capacity for happiness, they might be the best way to increase happiness even at the cost of everyone else
We care about utility monsters the most (which violates the egalitarian intuition)
Reversed:
We care about each beings equally
If there was a being that had by far the highest capacity for happiness, we still wouldn’t give them more resources
Utility monster
Original:
We care about increasing happiness
If there was a being that had by far the highest capacity for happiness, they might be the best way to increase happiness even at the cost of everyone else
We care about utility monsters the most (which violates the egalitarian intuition)
Reversed:
We care about each beings equally
If there was a being that had by far the highest capacity for happiness, we still wouldn’t give them more resources
We don’t care about increasing total happiness