You’re right, simply acknowledge differences is insufficient. You have to run it all the way to ground to discover there was never any ground as solid as you thought there was.
Right, none of our models are philosophically grounded. But, does that make them all equal? That’s what the post sounds like to me:
Well maybe: deny the concept of objective truth, of which there can only be one, and affirm subjectivism and pluralism.
To me, this seems like the ultimate Fallacy of Gray.
Then again, I am not well read at philosophy, so my comments might be isomorphic to “Yay pragmatism! Go objectivity!”, while those may or may not be compatible.
You’re right, simply acknowledge differences is insufficient. You have to run it all the way to ground to discover there was never any ground as solid as you thought there was.
Thank you for the link.
Right, none of our models are philosophically grounded. But, does that make them all equal? That’s what the post sounds like to me:
To me, this seems like the ultimate Fallacy of Gray.
Then again, I am not well read at philosophy, so my comments might be isomorphic to “Yay pragmatism! Go objectivity!”, while those may or may not be compatible.