Unfortunately, this attitude and your decision to put this in main rather than the discussion section is getting it downvoted. That will likely continue.
It didn’t. It made it back up to a score of 0.
Learn anything? Or since you only said “likely” will you say that your prediction isn’t contradicted by the result. Is never actually being contradicted by evidence one of the main appeals of only saying stuff is likely instead of conjecturing that it’s true?
Scores in the negative are kept track of despite not being displayed, however. In particular, people with negative karma have a commenting frequency limit, whereas people with zero karma do not.
Scores for total karma are displayed as zero if they are negative. Scores for individual articles can be negative (and in fact it is back to −1). I have various hypotheses about why the score has moved up but I’m waiting to gather more evidence before I state them.
It didn’t. It made it back up to a score of 0.
Learn anything? Or since you only said “likely” will you say that your prediction isn’t contradicted by the result. Is never actually being contradicted by evidence one of the main appeals of only saying stuff is likely instead of conjecturing that it’s true?
As far as I know, the minimum possible karma is zero; scores below that are, IIRC, displayed as zero.
Scores in the negative are kept track of despite not being displayed, however. In particular, people with negative karma have a commenting frequency limit, whereas people with zero karma do not.
Scores for total karma are displayed as zero if they are negative. Scores for individual articles can be negative (and in fact it is back to −1). I have various hypotheses about why the score has moved up but I’m waiting to gather more evidence before I state them.
The circle displaying your karma can’t display negative scores.