If English isn’t your native language, then you should get people to proofread what you’ve wrote as I suggested. It certainly doesn’t help that in the reposted version you didn’t even correct the grammatical and spelling mistakes which I explicitly pointed out.
And you don’t seem to be getting the substantive points: In particular, that some of your proposed restrictions are very vague and also that many such as the restriction to “rules” are just asking for trouble and at minimum are unlikely to help much at all.
I posted again before read your answer, because I got message from Nesov with suggestion to change font and because I didn’t see my message in the main topic (it was downvoted).
My browser doesnot show mistakes in the text., sorry for them.
The main point of my post is that in order to reach maximum of existing AI projects, the freindliness system must be simple and clear. Its parts must be mutual independent so different projects could implement those part which better suited to them.
And it is better that all AI projects would have some kind of friendliness, then to have correct but complex friendliness theory which is not implemented by any AI project.
And that is why I call this plan B. Because plan A is to wait until SIAI creates friendliness theory and then implement it in its AI project.
And it is better that all AI projects would have some kind of friendliness, then to have correct but complex friendliness theory which is not implemented by any AI project.
If English isn’t your native language, then you should get people to proofread what you’ve wrote as I suggested. It certainly doesn’t help that in the reposted version you didn’t even correct the grammatical and spelling mistakes which I explicitly pointed out.
And you don’t seem to be getting the substantive points: In particular, that some of your proposed restrictions are very vague and also that many such as the restriction to “rules” are just asking for trouble and at minimum are unlikely to help much at all.
I posted again before read your answer, because I got message from Nesov with suggestion to change font and because I didn’t see my message in the main topic (it was downvoted). My browser doesnot show mistakes in the text., sorry for them.
The main point of my post is that in order to reach maximum of existing AI projects, the freindliness system must be simple and clear. Its parts must be mutual independent so different projects could implement those part which better suited to them.
And it is better that all AI projects would have some kind of friendliness, then to have correct but complex friendliness theory which is not implemented by any AI project.
And that is why I call this plan B. Because plan A is to wait until SIAI creates friendliness theory and then implement it in its AI project.
Unfortunately incorrect. It is the same.