The point you make in the your first paragraph is contained in the original shortform post.
The point of the post is exactly that an UDASSA-style argument can nevertheless recover something like a ‘distribution of likely slowdown factors’.
This seems quite curious.
I suggest reading Falkovich’s post on UDASSA to get a sense whats so intriguing abouy the UDASSA franework.
The point you make in the your first paragraph is contained in the original shortform post. The point of the post is exactly that an UDASSA-style argument can nevertheless recover something like a ‘distribution of likely slowdown factors’. This seems quite curious.
I suggest reading Falkovich’s post on UDASSA to get a sense whats so intriguing abouy the UDASSA franework.