There’s plenty to criticise about mainstream alignment research
I’m curious what you think John’s valid criticisms are. His piece is so hyperbolic that I have to consider all arguments presented there somewhat suspect by default.
Edit: Clearly people disagree with this sentiment. I invite (and will strongly upvote) strong rebuttals.
I’m curious what you think John’s valid criticisms are. His piece is so hyperbolic that I have to consider all arguments presented there somewhat suspect by default.
Edit: Clearly people disagree with this sentiment. I invite (and will strongly upvote) strong rebuttals.