What is most troubling to me is not anything that Duncan or anyone else has said, but the stuff that you have said in the apparent belief that other people would say, “Oh, yeah, that’s completely exculpatory.”
I wanted very badly to believe that this was a huge misunderstanding but your own beliefs and behaviors, stated in your own words, are concerning to me.
I like to think I’m a pretty decent judge of character and fairly impartial. Actually, let me be honest. I was not partial. In your favor. I have no idea who the fuck Duncan Sabien is. I guess some celeb in this space?
Even if this post without the comments were the only thing I’d read, I’d still come away with the same take.
You have not shown a single claim in the warning doc to be false. Your “defense” is Trumpian, basically—just keep loudly declaring “fake news” and hope that nobody notices you provide zero evidence in service of your claims while there is a preponderance of evidence on the other side.
Then you’re probably very biased by the false things he’s stated in there.
What is most troubling to me is not anything that Duncan or anyone else has said, but the stuff that you have said in the apparent belief that other people would say, “Oh, yeah, that’s completely exculpatory.”
I wanted very badly to believe that this was a huge misunderstanding but your own beliefs and behaviors, stated in your own words, are concerning to me.
I like to think I’m a pretty decent judge of character and fairly impartial. Actually, let me be honest. I was not partial. In your favor. I have no idea who the fuck Duncan Sabien is. I guess some celeb in this space?
Even if this post without the comments were the only thing I’d read, I’d still come away with the same take.
You have not shown a single claim in the warning doc to be false. Your “defense” is Trumpian, basically—just keep loudly declaring “fake news” and hope that nobody notices you provide zero evidence in service of your claims while there is a preponderance of evidence on the other side.