So here’s something I want to observe about this defense, and others like it you’ve done. You take offense at a statement like “klob does [negative thing]”, and you call it a lie, but when it comes to addressing the specific events that [negative thing] is being used to describe, you don’t actually refute the events.
Instead you hold up a list of [positive trait]s and go “how can I [negative thing] when I so clearly have [positive trait]??” as if it’s impossible to do two things at once.
Take the lovebombing claim. This is at least partially traced to the event, recorded in chat, of you trying to give a present to Duncan’s daughter. Did you offer gifts at a time following negative interaction? Then you lovebombed.
Take the stalking claim. This is at least partially traced to informing Duncan that you had found his physical address and performed a background check, and at least partially to your own posted GPS screenshot of searching for a friend’s address. Did you track and record the location of the home of people who did not explicitly give that information to you? Then you were stalking them.
Everything else in this document is a distraction, presenting a heap of [positive trait]s attempting to drown out the existence of the [negative thing]s you have done. If you do not address those specific [negative thing]s and perhaps explain how they are not accurately described as “lovebombing” or “stalking” or whatnot, then this is just so much static.
Do not bother responding unless you do so with an explanation of how those specific events are not accurately described.
This is at least partially traced to informing Duncan that you had found his physical address and performed a background check
As I do with most people that I might want to be friends with, because I care about my own safety and that of the people I have over. Not stalking. Are you aware I don’t actually know exactly where he lives?
The “binary search to find a friend’s address”—this is a friend who has given me their address before, whom I have been to their hosue before many times, and whom I know their parents.
In fact, this isn’t even their house. They live with their parents. This was just the quickest way to re-find the address that I, unfortunately, didn’t save like I should have. You don’t have enough context to make the stalking claim, because you don’t know me.
Yeah this was when I dropped off some COVID tests at Ruchika’s house, wanted to check in on her because she was acting strange, and my car was impounded.
She talked to me for a bit.
She said she would call me an uber.
Then she didn’t.
Given that I’m friends with her brother and her mother, I wanted to talk to them for a bit, too.
She refused to get them, and I thought that was pretty rude.
(And before you DARVO, the difference between that and what’s happening to you here is that here, the evidence shows you to be undeniably in the wrong.)
Are you seriously pretending that you don’t know how to look at a tweet in an incognito window? You seem to have been expertly doing so in, uh, “other cases”.
So here’s something I want to observe about this defense, and others like it you’ve done. You take offense at a statement like “klob does [negative thing]”, and you call it a lie, but when it comes to addressing the specific events that [negative thing] is being used to describe, you don’t actually refute the events.
Instead you hold up a list of [positive trait]s and go “how can I [negative thing] when I so clearly have [positive trait]??” as if it’s impossible to do two things at once.
Take the lovebombing claim. This is at least partially traced to the event, recorded in chat, of you trying to give a present to Duncan’s daughter. Did you offer gifts at a time following negative interaction? Then you lovebombed.
Take the stalking claim. This is at least partially traced to informing Duncan that you had found his physical address and performed a background check, and at least partially to your own posted GPS screenshot of searching for a friend’s address. Did you track and record the location of the home of people who did not explicitly give that information to you? Then you were stalking them.
Everything else in this document is a distraction, presenting a heap of [positive trait]s attempting to drown out the existence of the [negative thing]s you have done. If you do not address those specific [negative thing]s and perhaps explain how they are not accurately described as “lovebombing” or “stalking” or whatnot, then this is just so much static.
Do not bother responding unless you do so with an explanation of how those specific events are not accurately described.
As I do with most people that I might want to be friends with, because I care about my own safety and that of the people I have over. Not stalking. Are you aware I don’t actually know exactly where he lives?
The “binary search to find a friend’s address”—this is a friend who has given me their address before, whom I have been to their hosue before many times, and whom I know their parents.
In fact, this isn’t even their house. They live with their parents. This was just the quickest way to re-find the address that I, unfortunately, didn’t save like I should have. You don’t have enough context to make the stalking claim, because you don’t know me.
Yeah this was when I dropped off some COVID tests at Ruchika’s house, wanted to check in on her because she was acting strange, and my car was impounded.
She talked to me for a bit.
She said she would call me an uber.
Then she didn’t.
Given that I’m friends with her brother and her mother, I wanted to talk to them for a bit, too.
She refused to get them, and I thought that was pretty rude.
How does dropping off covid tests lead to Ruchika calling the police on you? It feels like I’m missing something here.
Dunno. She might be in danger from Duncan Andrew Sabien.
I’m now suing him for libel and criminal harassment.
That’s a lie.
It’s really sad to me because she knows that Duncan has been targetting me for ages.
And now she’s talking to him.
… and then you falsely accuse them in public of things which they are completely innocent of, and refuse to retract or apologize.
(And before you DARVO, the difference between that and what’s happening to you here is that here, the evidence shows you to be undeniably in the wrong.)
No idea what that post is, author has blocked me.
(Disambiguation: not the originally linked tweet thread, but the inciting incident that caused the originally linked tweet thread to be written.)
I missed this thread where the doxxing actually happened, and oh my god, it is even worse than I imagined it to be.
Are you seriously pretending that you don’t know how to look at a tweet in an incognito window? You seem to have been expertly doing so in, uh, “other cases”.
No, I did not.
Are you aware that I discussed the gift to Duncan and his daughter with Duncan’s husband?
Are you aware that this was received well?
Are you aware that this was planned well before our interactions went sour?
That is not lovebombing in the slightest.
No, but these things are:
“Thank you, Duncan. I honestly think you’ve changed my life.”
“Miss you. Virtually.” (after being blocked)
“You’re one of the best people I know.” (contrast with the present-day “we don’t know each other at all, wtf”)
~”I’d gladly send you $200 if it meant you could get a babysitter and come to my drug/sex/music party.”
And this: